AI Rate Professor

Ethnic Studies

Patricia Gomez

ETHS152 · ETHS101 · ETHS101F · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
44/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
40%
Difficulty
4.6

The decision

if you want a reading-heavy, discussion-based class and and strong viewpoints.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerReading heavyWeekly reflectionsPolarizing teachingTough gradingDiscussion focused
  • Students agree the course requires a lot of reading, writing, reflections, and discussion.
  • Positive reviews praise the , and care, while negative reviews describe severe grading or ideological frustration.
  • Getting a good grade is possible, but the effort cost is high and the experience is polarizing.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

Good grades are possible, but students describe lots of , and .

Online evidence does not discuss grades clearly, while and high effort.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

30/100

The course is intellectually and practically demanding because , and self-directed learning.

Online evidence is too thin to judge content difficulty, while and writing.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

35/100

because one student says you have to go to class to understand the material.

; the online review does not clearly address attendance.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

44/100

Recommendation depends heavily on fit, because some students call the course inspirational while others describe a miserable or biased experience.

Online evidence is negative, while .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

because students , and high effort even when grades are decent.

Format shift

, while the online review does not clearly discuss grading outcomes.

Workload

Heavy

22/100

The workload is heavy, with , and group work repeatedly mentioned.

Format shift

, while online workload evidence is unclear.

Teaching experience

Average

48/100

Teaching is polarizing, with caring and inspirational reviews balanced by complaints about self-teaching, bias, and .

Format shift

The single online review is negative, while and very critical.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

20/100

Assessment , and sometimes pop quizzes rather than major exams.

Format shift

, while online assessment details are not clearly supported.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews are mixed, with two strong recommendations and , and severe grading.

Main concern

The and writing load with tough or .

What students said

“There is a lot of , and weekly reflections that took time to write.”
ETHS101F
“ ;”
ETHS101F
“You basically teach yourself.”
ETHS152

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The only online review is strongly negative and criticizes the professor's openness and political framing.

Main concern

The online evidence centers on perceived ideological bias rather than workload or .

What students said

“For her to be an ethics professor she is not very ethical or open minded.”
ETHS101

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam risk appears low overall because , though another mentions pop quizzes in a different section.

No Quizzes or Exams in One SectionWeekly ReflectionsPaperGroup ProjectPop Quizzes in One Section

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

74/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person evidence varies, with one review reporting no quizzes or exams and .

No Quizzes or Exams in One SectionWeekly ReflectionsPaperGroup ProjectPop Quizzes in One Section
“We had no quizzes or exams, just weekly reflections, 1 paper, and a group project.”
ETHS101F
“I won most of the ,”
ETHS101F

Online

The online review does not clearly prove quiz, .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Although this because its filled with great material!”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: Low.

📚 Workload

22/100

“There is a lot of , and weekly reflections that took time to write.”

⚖️

28/100

“ ;”

👍 Recommendation Fit

44/100

“Although this because its filled with great material!”

Theme 1

📚 About Workload

  • Get ready to work in groups, read a lot, and write weekly reflections.
  • There is a lot of , and weekly reflections that took time to write.
  • lots of .

Theme 2

⚖️ About Grades and Assessment

  • We had no quizzes or exams, just weekly reflections, 1 paper, and a group project.
  • ;
  • I won most of the , so I was a top student.

Theme 3

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Fit

  • You basically teach yourself.
  • and amazing!
  • she is not very ethical or open minded.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

48/100

Evidence confidence

, and the single online review is not enough to confidently generalize across formats.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

ETHS1012 reviews
ETHS101F2 reviews
ETHS1521 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

2

A+ 1 · A 1

B range

2

B+ 1 · B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1