AI Rate Professor

Paralegal

Heather Poole

PLEG217 · PLEG217F · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
20/100
RMP rating
1.9/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
4.8

The decision

unless you specifically want a very demanding class and can work independently with little support.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerHarsh ExamsPoor SupportFew GradesHeavy ReadingUnresponsive
  • Most reviews strongly warn against taking her because of , and low responsiveness.
  • The course appears content-heavy, reading-heavy, and difficult to follow.
  • One positive review praises her knowledge and passion, but it is outweighed by repeated severe complaints.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

15/100

Students describe impossible tests, few graded items, and GPA risk, so getting an A appears very difficult.

because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

18/100

The class is described as long, information-heavy, , and .

All course .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

20/100

Tags and comments indicate skipping class is risky, though .

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

15/100

The recommendation signal is extremely negative because students cite lack of help, poor responsiveness, and harsh testing.

All recommendation evidence is from in-person reviews, with .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

10/100

Grades depend on few difficult items, with , and material not covered in class.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

The course is described as long, reading-heavy, information-packed, and stressful because major tests carry heavy weight.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Poor

28/100

Most students report poor support, unresponsiveness, hard-to-follow lectures, and discouraging interactions despite one praise-heavy review.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

88/100

, and few graded items as the main grade drivers.

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews are mostly , and lack of help.

Main concern

Students report , and .

What students said

“Your grade is based off of impossible tests.”
PLEG217
“unresponsive to emails.”
PLEG217
“The midterm and and hard.”
PLEG217F

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

because and grades based on few assessments.

Hard MidtermHard FinalComprehensive ExamsFew Graded Items

Assessment risk

Strict

15/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and , but do not clearly prove proctoring, open-book rules, or closed-book rules.

Hard MidtermHard FinalComprehensive ExamsFew Graded Items
“ .”
PLEG217
“Your grade is based off of impossible tests.”
PLEG217
“The midterm and and hard.”
PLEG217F

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I was really looking forward to this class but trust me .”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and recommendation risk. Credibility rating: Medium.

⚠️ Recommendation Risk

15/100

“ .”

🧪

15/100

“Your grade is based off of impossible tests.”

👨‍🏫 Teaching Support

28/100

“unresponsive to emails.”

Theme 1

🧪

  • Graded by 6 things.
  • .
  • The midterm and and hard.

Theme 2

📚 About Difficulty

  • The class is not easy, is long and full of information.
  • Her lectures are hard to keep up with.
  • Get ready to read and participate.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Support

  • I can't help you if you're just bad student
  • unresponsive to emails.
  • Does not give back HW.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

, but the negative comments are detailed and consistent enough to flag substantial risk.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 53

Course coverage

PLEG2172 reviews
PLEG217F2 reviews

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values