AI Rate Professor

Humanities

Callista Lee

PSY20945 · PSY120 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
17/100
RMP rating
2.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

Avoid unless , and potentially uncomfortable personal writing expectations.

Best fit · Self Taught ProDisorganizedHeavy Personal WritingTough GraderReading HeavyNot Recommended
  • .
  • The most serious complaint says assignments required invasive personal writing and led to a failing grade when refused.
  • A more moderate review says she is knowledgeable and passionate but disorganized and often off track.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

18/100

The only reported grade is an F tied to refusing a personal assignment, and the and .

Online evidence labels her a , while and the most severe grading complaint.

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

The intellectual content itself seems moderate, but scattered materials, disorganization, and uncomfortable assignments make the course harder to navigate.

Online evidence points to confusing reading, while and personal writing demands.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

The reviews do not clearly .

Neither online .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

8/100

Students mainly warn against the class because of , and lack of organization.

Both formats are negative, with the .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

15/100

because one student reports failing after refusing invasive personal writing, and the online review tags her as a .

Format shift

Online evidence gives a , while .

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Workload feels heavy because students report and extensive personal writing.

Format shift

, while in-person evidence centers on large personal writing demands.

Teaching experience

Poor

28/100

Teaching quality is weak overall because students cite lack of teaching, disorganization, and unpreparedness despite one note of knowledge and passion.

Format shift

Online evidence says she did not teach enough, while and some praise for passion.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

20/100

Reviews emphasize writing, reading, and course materials rather than exams.

Format shift

Online evidence focuses on reading, while .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are mixed-to-negative, with one severe complaint about invasive writing and one noting passion but poor organization.

Main concern

Students may face uncomfortable personal writing or .

What students said

“Be prepared to be forced to write A LOT about your very personal sex life in detail.”
PSY120
“ and prepared for class.”
PSY20945

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The single online review says the mandatory professor-written book felt scattered and the professor did not teach enough.

Main concern

Online learning .

What students said

“I wouldve preferred a book that wasnt written by the Professor and for the Professor to actually teach.”
PSY120

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the Browser, midterm format, or final format.

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The , open-book status, closed-book status, proctoring, midterms, or finals.

Online

The online review does not clearly prove webcam use, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ if you actually want to learn or share that info”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and student concerns. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

28/100

“I wouldve preferred a book that wasnt written by the Professor and for the Professor to actually teach.”

🚫 Recommendation Rate

8/100

“ if you actually want to learn or share that info”

⚖️

15/100

“I got an F for refusing to share details on my intimate sexual experiences, kinks, preferences and more horrific things she would ask us to write about.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and prepared for class.
  • Can go off on a tangent quite easily.
  • Professor Lee is very knowledgeable and passionate about teaching the subject.

Theme 2

📚 About Reading and Assignments

  • I did not enjoy the book that as it felt all over the place when going over each chapter.
  • Be prepared to be forced to write A LOT about your very personal sex life in detail.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Student Experience

  • Very creepy and disgusting!
  • Personally did not like this class as much as I hoped with Professor Lee during this online semester.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

38/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is low because only 3 reviews exist across a long time span, though the negative pattern is consistent.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

PSY1202 reviews
PSY209451 review

Reported outcomes

F results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values