AI Rate Professor

English

Bruce Henderson

ENG204 · ENGL100F · ENGLISH100HYB · ENG245 · ENGL105 · ENGL100 · ENGLISH100 · ENGL103H · ENG105 · ENG239 · ENG · ENG100 · ENG103 · 68 lifetime ratings

AI rating
43/100
RMP rating
3.7/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
2.1

The decision

Consider Henderson only if you prioritize an easy grade and can tolerate highly opinion-driven, polarizing instruction.

Best fit · Easy A HunterVery easy APolitical tangentsPolarizing lecturesWeak writing instructionExtra credit available
  • Many older in-person reviews call the class easy, especially for students who read, participate, and use .
  • Student reactions to teaching quality are highly polarized because lectures often drift into politics, conspiracies, veganism, and world affairs.
  • A recent online review makes a serious student safety allegation, so students should treat the online evidence as a major caution signal.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

82/100

Most in-person reviews say the class is easy with , and , though a few students report harsh outcomes.

The easy A , while the single online review is a safety warning and gives no useful grade-effort pattern.

Is the course easy?

Introductory

80/100

The workload and concepts are often described as easy, but the class can feel hard for students who dislike the lecture topics or quiz style.

In-person reviews repeatedly call the course easy, while the online review does not provide course-content evidence.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

55/100

Attendance appears important because quizzes, discussions, and in-class essays can matter, but reviews do .

and participation, while the online review provides no attendance detail.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

48/100

Students are split between loving his interesting, easy classes and warning that he teaches opinions instead of English writing.

In-person reviews are polarized but detailed, while the lone online review is strongly negative and safety-focused.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

72/100

Many students describe easy grading and extra credit, but some report .

Format shift

, while the online review does not support grading leniency.

Workload

Light

78/100

Reviews often , and , though reading and papers still appear.

Format shift

, while the online review gives no normal workload detail.

Teaching experience

Average

45/100

He is knowledgeable and interesting to some students, but many say he does not teach writing well and spends class on unrelated viewpoints.

Format shift

In-person evidence is strongly polarized, while the single online review is negative but not about teaching mechanics.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Assessment commonly includes essays, reading quizzes, participation, research work, and occasional in-class writing rather than a .

Format shift

In-person reviews provide assessment details, while the online review only tags the class as test heavy without supporting specifics.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

49 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

but polarizing English class with many political tangents and mixed value for writing instruction.

Main concern

The main concern is that students may learn little formal English writing and may need to tolerate his viewpoints.

What students said

“If you want an english class with an easy A .”
ENG100
“He never once talked about HOW to write.”
ENG100

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The only online review is a serious negative safety warning and does not provide normal course-format detail.

Main concern

A student alleges he is not safe for young women.

What students said

“if you are a young woman do not take this professor he is not ”
ENG

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention quizzes and in-class essays, but do not clearly prove open-book rules, closed-book rules, webcam use, Lockdown Browser, or proctoring.

Reading QuizzesIn-Class EssayMidterm EssayFinal EssayExtra Credit

Assessment risk

Varies

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

midterm essay, and a final essay, but do not clearly prove book rules or proctoring details.

Reading QuizzesIn-Class EssayMidterm EssayFinal Essay
“ and an in .”
ENG103
“If .”
ENGLISH100HYB

Online

The online review does not clearly prove exam format, webcam use, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, open-book rules, or .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you want an english class with an easy A .”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting grade ease, polarized teaching style, writing instruction concerns, and format-specific evidence. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

45/100

“He doesn't teach how to write or construct an description is”

📈 Easy Grade

82/100

“If you don't get an A it's because you didn't want one.”

⚠️ Polarized Fit

48/100

“If you're willing to sit in class and listen to his bullcrap about veganism, liberal conspiracies, and .”

Theme 1

🗣️ About Lecture Style

  • He spends his entire class on his soapbox spouting conspiracy theories.
  • Class discussions are very interesting and encourage students to think outside the box.
  • He talks so much and it gets so boring!!

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • Seriously, easy A.
  • Henderson's class is easy.
  • if you don't pass 4 out of 7 quizzes.

Theme 3

✍️ About Writing Instruction

  • Learned absolutely nothing about English or how to write a paper
  • I don't feel prepared to write.
  • and gives advice on how to make your writing better.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

68

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

The rating is credible because it uses 50 reviews over a long span, but the newest online review and differs sharply from older in-person grade-focused reviews.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 529
4 out of 515
3 out of 512
2 out of 55
1 out of 57

Course coverage

ENG10022 reviews
ENGL10010 reviews
ENG1035 reviews
ENGL100F2 reviews
ENGL103H2 reviews
Show 8 more courses
ENGLISH1002 reviews
ENG1 review
ENG1051 review
ENG2041 review
ENG2391 review
ENG2451 review
ENGL1051 review
ENGLISH100HYB1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

13 reported outcomes

A range

3

A 3

B range

3

B+ 2 · B 1

C range

2

C+ 1 · C 1

D range

1

D 1

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

3

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 1 · Not_Sure_Yet 1