AI Rate Professor

English

Kimberly Vandervort

ENG224 · ENGL103 · ENGL100 · ENGL224 · ENG105 · ENG225 · ENGL225 · ENG100 · ENG103 · 13 lifetime ratings

AI rating
80/100
RMP rating
4.4/5
Take again
76.92%
Difficulty
3.1

The decision

if you want to improve as a writer and , and deadlines.

Best fit · Effort For RewardStrong essay feedbackReading-heavyWriting-heavyCaring and accessibleExtra credit
  • Most , and ability to improve writing.
  • The workload is the main risk, especially in online courses with , and tight weekly deadlines.
  • Grades can be strong with effort and , but she is not a low-effort easy A.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

68/100

A strong grade is realistic with effort, , and revisions, but students warn that it is not an easy A and and writing.

as rewarding, while online reviews show more risk from workload and tight scheduling.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

The material is manageable but , and discussion make the course intellectually active rather than easy.

Online sections feel harder mainly because of workload pacing, while and engagement.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

48/100

Reviews stress showing up, participating, and being prepared, but they do not clearly prove a .

In-person reviews emphasize participation more than online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

78/100

and growth, but busy students may struggle with the workload and scheduling.

In-person recommendation is stronger, while online reviews are more divided because of workload.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

62/100

Students mention , revisions, and clear expectations, but also say she can be a tough or .

Format shift

Online reviews mention extra credit and one late-work ticket, while but still require real effort.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Many reviews mention lots of , and occasional overwhelming weeks.

Format shift

Online workload is the biggest concern, though in-person literature and writing and essays.

Teaching experience

Good

84/100

Most students describe her as , and strong at giving useful writing feedback, despite a few negative workload experiences.

Format shift

, while online teaching feedback is positive but more mixed.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

24/100

Reviews focus on essays, reading, response questions, discussions, papers, and .

Format shift

Both formats appear assignment-heavy, with online reviews especially focused on weekly work and papers.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

7 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews are very positive overall, , and meaningful improvement through reading and essays.

Main concern

Students must keep up with , and essays.

What students said

“She makes you work and you truly become a better writer and reader with her class.”
ENG100
“ ”
ENG225

Remote format

Online

6 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

, and , but some students found the workload and scheduling overwhelming.

Main concern

Online workload can be heavy and tightly scheduled for students with busy work schedules.

What students said

“She does give a loooot of writing which could get overwhelming during busy weeks.”
ENGL100
“Way too "scheduled" for online”
ENGL100

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove an , and assessment appears , and assignments.

No Clear Exam PolicyAssignment-Based CoursePapers and Reading

Assessment risk

Varies

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and discussion participation, but do not clearly prove exam format or exam policy.

EssaysReadingDiscussion Participation
“A lot of group work and good amount of essays, at least 5.”
ENG100
“Do the and know the general topic about the readings.”
ENGL224

Online

, and late-work flexibility, but do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, open-book, quizzes, midterms, or finals.

Weekly WorkPapersExtra Credit
“She does give a loooot of writing which could get overwhelming during busy weeks.”
ENGL100
“Provides a few opportunities, as well.”
ENGL100

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She makes you work and you truly become a better writer and reader with her class.”

Voice snapshots generated from 13 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

84/100

“She gives lots of feedback and clearly is invested in your work.”

📚 Workload Intensity

28/100

“So the amount of . and there is a ton of reading!”

⚖️

62/100

“ . .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 and Care

  • She gives lots of feedback and clearly is invested in your work.
  • She is so caring and .
  • Shes always there to help out with your essays and she makes the material relatable.

Theme 2

📚 About Reading and Writing Load

  • She does give a loooot of writing which could get overwhelming during busy weeks.
  • A lot of group work and good amount of essays, at least 5.
  • There was TONS of but the classes were fun and group oriented.

Theme 3

💻 About Online Format

  • .
  • Way too "scheduled" for online
  • You have to put in the work, but it wasn't difficult work.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

13

Recent reviews read by the AI

13

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Thirteen reviews across online and in-person formats provide detailed, consistent evidence about teaching strengths and workload risks.

Inside 13 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 510
4 out of 50
3 out of 52
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ENGL1005 reviews
ENG1001 review
ENG1031 review
ENG1051 review
ENG2241 review
Show 4 more courses
ENG2251 review
ENGL1031 review
ENGL2241 review
ENGL2251 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

12 reported outcomes

A range

9

A+ 1 · A 8

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

1

D+ 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Drop/Withdrawal 2