AI Rate Professor

Graphic Arts

Michelle Don Vito

DART100 · ART138 · DART146 · DART140 · 9 lifetime ratings

AI rating
100/100
RMP rating
4.8/5
Take again
88.89%
Difficulty
2.8

The decision

if and are willing to keep up with project details.

Best fit · Effort For RewardExcellent feedbackCaring mentorClear gradingDesign portfolio valueFast-paced projects
  • Students consistently say she teaches design clearly and .
  • Grades are usually strong, but and class participation.
  • Most reviews describe her classes as inspiring, practical, and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

82/100

Most students earned A-range grades, but the A depends , and responding to detailed feedback.

Online evidence is very positive but limited, while about picky grading and attendance.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

The and well explained, but some courses move fast and .

The online review frames the work as fun and manageable, while challenging and fast-paced.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

Several in-person comments say showing up matters, and one review warns that skipping class can hurt your chance of passing.

Attendance evidence comes almost entirely from in-person reviews, with .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

94/100

Students overwhelmingly recommend her because , and helps them improve as designers.

Both formats are positive, but the recommendation is much stronger and better supported in the in-person reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

72/100

and usually fair, but she can be particular when project requirements are missed.

Format shift

Online evidence does not mention strict grading, while project evaluation.

Workload

Moderate

62/100

The , and weekly assignments, but most students find the timelines manageable.

Format shift

Online evidence describes fun projects, while , drafts, and weekly work.

Teaching experience

Excellent

96/100

Students repeatedly describe her as caring, knowledgeable, passionate, and highly .

Format shift

Both online and providing broader and stronger evidence.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

18/100

Grades appear , and assignments rather than exams.

Format shift

Both formats emphasize projects, while .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

8 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

, and clear project expectations while noting a fast pace and picky grading.

Main concern

You need to attend, follow requirements, and .

What students said

“ and .”
DART140
“She moves very fast and is understanding if you ask her to slow down.”
DART100

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

The online review describes a and helpful critiques.

Main concern

Only one online review limits confidence.

What students said

“One of the .”
DART100
“The and it's always interesting to see everyone else's work when we do critiques.”
DART100

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

, and they do not clearly prove a consistent exam policy.

Project-Based AssessmentTests After ProjectsExam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Varies

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, but reviews do not clearly prove exam rules or proctoring requirements.

Tests After ProjectsExam Policy Not Clearly Proven
“weekly assignments multiple rough drafts 3 ”
DART100

Online

The online review does not clearly describe .

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Michelle is an amazing teacher and .”

Voice snapshots generated from 9 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and design value. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

96/100

“This professor knows her stuff really well and is very passionate.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

94/100

“ !”

⚖️

72/100

“ and .”

Theme 1

👩‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She is super caring, I am sad that this semester is ending, but !
  • I always feel like I've .
  • She has an amazing knowledge of design.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • The course structure can be challenging at times, but very rewarding for students who put in the effort and want to be good at design.
  • It's true that she can , but it's honestly for your own good.
  • She moves very fast and is understanding if you ask her to slow down.

Theme 3

🎨 About Design Value

  • I learned SOO much.
  • I learned so much in this class and used a lot of it for my portfolio.
  • have gained so much knowledge & portfolio pieces from them all.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

9

Recent reviews read by the AI

9

Lifetime ratings

87/100

Evidence confidence

Nine reviews across several years are detailed and highly consistent, though only one online review limits format-specific certainty.

Inside 9 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 58
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ART1383 reviews
DART1003 reviews
DART1402 reviews
DART1461 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

9 reported outcomes

A range

7

A+ 2 · A 5

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 1