AI Rate Professor

Child Development

Mary Hood

CHILD261 · CDESCDES · CDES261 · CSES261 · 13 lifetime ratings

AI rating
97/100
RMP rating
4.9/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
2.0

The decision

if you want a and can handle the required field hours.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyCaring mentorClear structureField experienceVolunteering requiredHighly recommended
  • Students overwhelmingly praise her as caring, knowledgeable, inspirational, and experienced in elementary education.
  • The class is generally easy and , but the required .
  • field insight and supportive teaching.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

82/100

The class is very achievable with and , but field hours and steady work prevent it from being a free A.

Online reviews emphasize volunteering hours, while if students stay on top of work.

Is the course easy?

Introductory

86/100

Reviews describe the material as , and easy to follow for child development students.

Both formats describe accessible content, with online difficulty mainly coming from field-hour logistics.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

62/100

Reviews do , but participation, volunteering, and class engagement appear important.

Online evidence centers on required volunteering hours, while but not clearly strict.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

98/100

Students almost universally recommend her because , and inspiring for education-focused students.

Both online and , though online comments add a warning about field-hour scheduling.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

78/100

Students mention , and easy success when assignments and field requirements are completed.

Format shift

Online reviews note effort is still required, while and support.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

The academic work sounds manageable, but volunteering hours and .

Format shift

Online workload is dominated by 45 to 50 field hours, while and volunteering.

Teaching experience

Excellent

96/100

Students consistently praise her , and ability to inspire future educators.

Format shift

Both formats praise her teaching, with stronger detail from in-person reviews.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

, and field work more than exams.

Format shift

Both formats point toward assignment and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

11 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person reviews consistently describe her as warm, helpful, experienced, and practice.

Main concern

The main concern in person is time spent on homework, reading, or volunteering rather than difficulty.

What students said

“Lectures were straight to the point.”
CDES261
“Time consuming with homework and volunteering, but overall an easy class if you stay on top of it.”
CDES261
“Mary is made to teach.”
CDES261

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online reviews are highly positive but note that weekly modules are easy only if students can complete the required classroom volunteering hours.

Main concern

The main concern online is the 45 to 50 hours of elementary school volunteering during school hours.

What students said

“The weekly modules are straight to the if you put the effort in.”
CDES261
“Not an easy A, so if you cant dedicate 50 hours of your semester to being at an elementary school during school hours.”
CDES261

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, open-book rules, webcam use, or .

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, open-book rules, quiz format, midterm format, or .

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove exam policy, proctoring, webcam use, .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Mary is made to teach.”

Voice snapshots generated from 13 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, support, workload, and field-hour expectations. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

96/100

“Mary is made to teach.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

98/100

“If you need to take !”

📚 Workload Reality

55/100

“Time consuming with homework and volunteering, but overall an easy class if you stay on top of it.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Lectures were straight to the point.
  • Mary makes class fun with lots of good discussion and funny stories from her elementary classroom that relate to the topic of discussion.
  • She is an AMAZING teacher. Sensitive, willing to listen, and patient.

Theme 2

❤️ About Character

  • Very sweet Professor who is very knowledgeable and truly cares for what she does.
  • Sweet lady, really wants us to do well.
  • Awesome Teacher...Very helpful and easy to talk to.

Theme 3

📚 About Workload and Field Hours

  • You do need at least 45 hours of volunteering in a classroom.
  • Not an easy A, so if you cant dedicate 50 hours of your semester to being at an elementary school during school hours.
  • Time consuming with homework and volunteering, but overall an easy class if you stay on top of it.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

13

Recent reviews read by the AI

13

Lifetime ratings

72/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is medium because only 13 reviews are available, but they are strongly consistent across many years and both formats.

Inside 13 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 512
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

CDES26110 reviews
CDESCDES1 review
CHILD2611 review
CSES2611 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

3

A 3

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1