AI Rate Professor

Business

Gabriela Fernandez

CIS228 · BUS211 · CIS111 · ACCT101A · ACCT101 · 12 lifetime ratings

AI rating
48/100
RMP rating
2.9/5
Take again
66.67%
Difficulty
3.1

The decision

if you can learn independently and value practical work over polished lectures.

Best fit · Self Taught ProSelf-teaching riskHeavy lab workMixed clarityHelpful by emailTough grading
  • Reviews are sharply mixed, with newer CIS228 students praising practical learning and .
  • Students often describe heavy work, daily labs, projects, presentations, or expensive materials.
  • She may help responsive students, but .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

42/100

An A is possible, but comments point to , and self-teaching rather than an easy path.

Online evidence is negative but sparse, while and some easier attendance-light courses.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

36/100

The content often feels difficult because , and students may need to learn from books or assignments independently.

The online review reports little assignment guidance, and many in-person reviews describe unclear or self-directed learning.

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

88/100

and does not mind students leaving early.

; the online review provides no attendance evidence.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

52/100

Recommendations depend heavily on course and learning style, with practical CIS students more positive and many .

The online review is a , while and strong criticism.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

32/100

Students mention and one online student calls her a , though resubmissions can soften the impact in CIS228.

Format shift

Online grading evidence is harsh, while and resubmission chances.

Workload

Heavy

30/100

Workload is often described as heavy through daily labs, , and multiple books.

Format shift

The online review focuses on poor assignment guidance, while .

Teaching experience

Average

48/100

She can be caring and practical, but many students describe unclear, boring, or insufficient instruction.

Format shift

Online teaching evidence is poor, while in-person evidence .

Assessment method

Balanced

54/100

Assessments include homework, , and online exams.

Format shift

; the online review only mentions assignments.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

11 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

instruction to unclear, long, or self-taught lectures.

Main concern

Lecture clarity and workload vary widely by course and year.

What students said

“ and the workload a bit heavy”
CIS228
“ and .”
ACCT101A
“you pretty much have to figure out the information yourself.”
BUS211

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The only online review is strongly negative and and teaching materials were lacking.

Main concern

Students may receive little guidance when stuck online.

What students said

“No video notes or ideas on how to get started with assignment.”
CIS111

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam evidence is limited but and online multiple-choice quizzes, with no clear proof of strict proctoring.

Open Book Notes Coding TestsOnline Homework Quizzes ExamsMultiple Choice Quizzes

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

76/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and online homework, quizzes, and exams, but do not prove proctoring rules.

Open Book NotesCoding Task TestsOnline ExamsMultiple Choice Quizzes
“ /notes.”
CIS228
“All the are mulitiple choices)”
ACCT101A

Online

The online review does not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“you pretty much have to figure out the information yourself.”

Voice snapshots generated from 12 reviews, highlighting divided opinions , and self-directed learning. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

48/100

“ , but if you have questions .”

⚖️

32/100

“ and the workload a bit heavy”

👍 Recommendation Fit

52/100

“ !”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She really enjoys teaching & cares if you understand or not.
  • Her lectures are extremely long and so boring.
  • She speeds through her lectures with and doesnt do the .

Theme 2

📚 About Workload

  • there is .
  • You have to do a project and an individual presentation at the end of the class
  • I spent more than 300 dollars on four books

Theme 3

🧭 About Independence

  • I felt like I didn't need to even show up for the lecture because I was practically teaching myself.
  • if you dont .
  • did not help at all when students asked for it.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

12

Recent reviews read by the AI

12

Lifetime ratings

66/100

Evidence confidence

Twelve reviews span many years and courses, but opinions conflict strongly and only .

Inside 12 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 53
3 out of 52
2 out of 54
1 out of 51

Course coverage

CIS1116 reviews
ACCT101A2 reviews
CIS2282 reviews
ACCT1011 review
BUS2111 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1