AI Rate Professor

Health Care Studies

Mauren Salsitz

ANTH102 · ANTH101LF · COS332 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
48/100
RMP rating
2.7/5
Take again
33.33%
Difficulty
3.7

The decision

if and want a manageable grade more than engaging lectures.

Best fit · Effort For RewardHeavy WorkloadTest HeavyDry LecturesEasy QuizzesMixed Recommendation
  • Students repeatedly mention a heavy workload, especially in the lab class.
  • Grades can be manageable because quizzes, open-textbook work, and cheat sheets help.
  • Teaching reviews are mixed, ranging from very negative to a decent backup choice.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

68/100

An A is realistic when students keep up with homework and quizzes, but the workload can be disproportionate.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Standard

50/100

The material is not described as intellectually brutal, but the workload and .

, so no format difference can be assessed.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do not clearly prove an .

and .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

35/100

Only one of because the workload and lecture quality frustrate students.

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

70/100

Two A grades and comments about easy quizzes, open textbook quizzes, cheat sheets, and an easy A .

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

25/100

Students repeatedly report lots of homework and unusually high effort for the unit value.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Average

50/100

Students describe her as nice and sometimes useful, but also bad or dry and slide-dependent.

Format shift

Teaching .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

75/100

Reviews mention tests and quizzes heavily, though .

Format shift

Assessment .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews describe heavy workload, mixed teaching quality, and some grade-friendly assessments.

Main concern

The main concern is high workload paired with dry or weak teaching.

What students said

“I put in more work in this 1 unit class than a few of my 3 unit ones.”
ANTH101LF
“Her lectures are a little dry, she just reads off the slides but shes an easy A”
ANTH102

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam and as open-textbook quizzes and cheat sheets.

Online Open Textbook QuizzesCheat Sheet AllowedEasy Quizzes

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

82/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews mention easy quizzes and tests where students get a cheat sheet, but .

Open Textbook QuizzesCheat Sheet AllowedEasy Quizzes
“ , though.”
ANTH101LF
“stay on top of and open textbook)”
ANTH102
“ basically copy paste your answers onto the test.”
ANTH102

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I put in more work in this 1 unit class than a few of my 3 unit ones.”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Low.

📚 Workload

25/100

“be prepared to do a lotta work.”

🎯 Teaching Quality

50/100

“Her lectures are a little dry, she just reads off the slides but shes an easy A”

📈 Grade Path

68/100

“As long as you do your HW and stay on top of and open textbook) you will do fine.”

Theme 1

📚 About Workload

  • She is bad
  • be prepared to do a lotta work.
  • I put in more work in this 1 unit class than a few of my 3 unit ones.

Theme 2

📈

  • , though. Got an A.
  • basically copy paste your answers onto the test.
  • shes an easy A

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

40/100

Evidence confidence

, and one is extremely vague, though workload complaints are consistent.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ANTH101LF1 review
ANTH1021 review
COS3321 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Rather not say 1