AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Aemiro Beyene

MATH15 · MATH040 · MATH114 · MATH20 · 8 lifetime ratings

AI rating
77/100
RMP rating
4.1/5
Take again
80%
Difficulty
2.6

The decision

if you want a and are willing to attend class and keep up with homework.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyPatient TeachingHomework RequiredAttendance MattersExtra CreditMixed Consistency
  • Most students praise him as , and supportive, especially for students nervous about math.
  • Success depends , and staying engaged.
  • A few in-person reviews report lateness, skipped material, or .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

68/100

An A is realistic with , and effort, but reviews do not support a no-effort Easy A.

Online and in-person reviews both say effort matters, while and .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

70/100

, though homework and occasional test mismatch keep it from being effortless.

Online evidence emphasizes clear structure, while but more mixed.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

38/100

as formally mandatory, but several reviews say missing class can hurt grades and perception.

The online review does not mention attendance, while .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

78/100

, and support, though a few warn about organization and test alignment.

The single online review is positive, and serious concerns.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

72/100

He appears lenient toward students who try, offers , and values commitment, but .

Format shift

Online grading is described as clear and effort-based, while and tough-test complaints.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

and several reviews emphasize that students must keep up to pass.

Format shift

Both formats mention doing the work, while .

Teaching experience

Good

80/100

Most students describe him as , and caring, but some report lateness, skipped sections, or poor test alignment.

Format shift

The online review is strongly positive, while but less consistent.

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

The , and students mention both as important to outcomes.

Format shift

Online evidence highlights homework and clear grading, while , and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

7 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person reviews are mostly positive about his patience and clarity, but , and .

Main concern

Homework and , and a minority of students found tests disconnected from teaching.

What students said

“His lectures are easy to understand and methods are simple to grasp.”
MATH20
“He expects you to do the hw even though he hasn't covered the material in class.”
MATH040
“The stuff he teaches weren't even on the tests.”
141

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

The online review praises his clear syllabus, Zoom availability, caring attitude, and .

Main concern

.

What students said

“ even on weekends).”
MATH114
“if you do the work you will pass don't do hw and you'll have hard time passing”
MATH114

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention moderate tests and some mismatch between teaching and tests, but do .

Moderate TestsTest Alignment ConcernsExam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Standard

52/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and one serious complaint that taught material did not match tests, but do not clearly prove exam rules.

Moderate TestsTest Alignment Concerns
“ but gives good notes.”
MATH20
“The stuff he teaches weren't even on the tests.”
141
“Half of class got less than 40% on tests and ended up dropping.”
141

Online

The online review does not clearly prove any exam policy, proctoring rule, .

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“He takes time with the students, and doesn't rush anything.”

Voice snapshots generated from 8 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and consistency. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

80/100

“He takes the and formulas so you can pass the class and prep for the next.”

📚 Effort Requirement

68/100

“ .”

⚠️ Consistency Risk

52/100

“The stuff he teaches weren't even on the tests.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • His lectures are easy to understand and methods are simple to grasp.
  • He takes time with the students, and doesn't rush anything.
  • He is the and funny.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty And Grades

  • if you do the work you will pass don't do hw and you'll have hard time passing
  • .
  • Do the .

Theme 3

⚠️ About Course Risks

  • He expects you to do the hw even though he hasn't covered the material in class.
  • The stuff he teaches weren't even on the tests.
  • Half of class got less than 40% on tests and ended up dropping.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

8

Recent reviews read by the AI

8

Lifetime ratings

70/100

Evidence confidence

Eight reviews include useful detail across several years, but one online review and .

Inside 8 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 55
4 out of 50
3 out of 52
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

MATH153 reviews
MATH202 reviews
1411 review
MATH0401 review
MATH1141 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

2

B 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Not sure yet 1 · Rather not say 1