AI Rate Professor

Child Development

Deanna Parga

CDES208F · CDES208 · CDES204 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
81/100
RMP rating
4.0/5
Take again
66.67%
Difficulty
2.0

The decision

if you are comfortable with group work and can handle some uneven structure.

Best fit · Effort For RewardAccessibleGroup ProjectsCaringSomewhat Unstructured
  • Students describe her as helpful, reassuring, and generally easy to work with.
  • The course is not very hard, but and .
  • because one student wanted more organization.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

72/100

Grades seem reachable with normal effort, but and .

Online evidence centers on a major group project, while but .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

74/100

Students describe the content as pretty easy, though lectures can be boring and structure can be inconsistent.

Both formats suggest manageable content, with and organization issues.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

55/100

Participation matters and group work appear important, but .

Both formats emphasize participation or group work, with .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

73/100

Most students recommend her because she is helpful and caring, though organization is a concern for some.

The online review is clearly positive, while and structurally critical.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

68/100

and manageable, with study-guide-like tests, but there is not enough evidence for .

Format shift

, while the online review does not describe grading leniency.

Workload

Moderate

63/100

Homework sounds limited in one review, but papers and a .

Format shift

Online workload is shaped by a large group project, while papers.

Teaching experience

Good

78/100

She is described as , and caring, but one review says she lacked organization.

Format shift

Online feedback is strongly supportive, while .

Assessment method

Balanced

48/100

Assessment , and tests rather than relying mainly on exams.

Format shift

Online evidence highlights a , while , and group work.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

teaching, but one review notes weak organization.

Main concern

Students who need structure may be frustrated by disorganization.

What students said

“It's pretty easy.”
CDES208F
“she wasn't very organized in class and ”
CDES204

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

The online review is positive and highlights accessibility, reassurance, and a .

Main concern

A a lighter online class.

What students said

“there is a ”
CDES208
“ at the end”
CDES208

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews suggest tests may follow study guides, but as open-book status or .

Study Guide Based TestsExam Policy Not Fully Clear

Assessment risk

Standard

62/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, but does not clearly prove book policy or strictness.

Study Guide Based Tests
“ so you'll be good.”
CDES208F

Online

The online review does not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, webcam use, open-book status, or .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I like the professor, there is a massive group project at the end of the semester which I wished I knew going in, but overall she's great and .”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, workload, and structure. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

78/100

“overall she's great and ”

📚 Workload Shape

63/100

“there is a ”

⚖️ Structure Concern

68/100

“Overall nice professor but I need structure sometimes”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • at the end
  • Deanna is a pretty chill professor.
  • and somewhat knowledgeable

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • It's pretty easy.
  • so you'll be good.
  • I .

Theme 3

🧩

  • there is a
  • she wasn't very organized in class and

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

, but they include useful detail across online and in-person formats.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

CDES2041 review
CDES2081 review
CDES208F1 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

2

B+ 1 · B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values