AI Rate Professor

Design

Adrianna Currie

HIST180 · DRAF110 · IDES190 · IDES100 · IDESCAREERS · IDES110F · ARCH125 · IDES180 · DRAFDRAF · 17 lifetime ratings

AI rating
39/100
RMP rating
2.6/5
Take again
40%
Difficulty
2.9

The decision

if and self-directed work; students needing clear instruction should look elsewhere.

Best fit · Self Taught ProBlunt CritiquesVague InstructionsSelf-Teaching RiskDesign KnowledgePolarizing Personality
  • Students repeatedly criticize unclear instructions, limited teaching, and rude or .
  • A smaller group values her design knowledge, honesty, and real-world expectations.
  • Grades can be manageable, but the learning experience is risky for students who need guidance.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

57/100

Good grades are possible and some students say , but vague instructions and resubmissions raise the effort cost.

Online evidence suggests a harder A due to tough grading, while .

Is the course easy?

Standard

49/100

The material itself is not consistently described as hard, but and .

The online review describes unclear and demanding work, while stressful drafting.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

45/100

, though one review says she penalizes leaving early and presentations matter.

In-person evidence mentions leaving early penalties and presentations, while the lone .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

35/100

Most students warn against her because and harsh communication overshadow her subject knowledge.

Both formats include negative experiences, with the online review especially severe and in-person reviews more mixed.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

50/100

Some students say , but others report unexplained deductions and tough critique standards.

Format shift

Online grading is described as tough and unclear, while and frustrating.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

Workload varies by class, with presentations, exams, reading, and resubmissions but not constant overload in most reviews.

Format shift

The online review mentions lots of homework and resubmissions, while .

Teaching experience

Poor

42/100

Students frequently say she does not teach clearly, reads from materials, gives vague directions, and speaks condescendingly.

Format shift

Online and , though a few in-person students praise her knowledge.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

36/100

Design and , and resubmissions, with some history courses using exams and quizzes.

Format shift

Online evidence focuses on assignments and resubmissions, while and history exams.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

16 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

but often describe poor teaching, rude comments, and a .

Main concern

The main concern is a condescending style and .

What students said

“there is no teaching involved.”
IDES180
“The teacher does not tell you how to do the work, only to do it, then starts marking everything wrong.”
IDES110F

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The single online review is strongly negative, , and heavy resubmission work.

Main concern

The main concern is unclear assignment expectations with .

What students said

“Her instructions are insanely vague and unclear.”
IDES100
“get ready to resubmit stuff!”
IDES100

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam policy is not a major theme, and the clearest evidence mentions study guides, three exams, and .

Study GuidesThree ExamsTwo Quizzes

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and quizzes, but do not clearly prove open-book, closed-book, or proctoring rules.

Study GuidesThree ExamsTwo Quizzes
“she reads the book to you, shows the material. and give su a study guide.”
IDES180
“There is alot of topics covered for the 3 exams and i think 2 quizes.”
IDES180

Online

The online review does not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“The teacher does not tell you how to do the work, only to do it, then starts marking everything wrong.”

Voice snapshots generated from 17 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

42/100

“there is no teaching involved.”

⚖️

50/100

“Testing and .”

⚠️ Main Risk

35/100

“Her instructions are insanely vague and unclear.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She assigns reading and but .
  • She doesn't teach, she reads from the book.
  • Ms. Currie has a wealth of knowledge which she is able to share in a manner easily understood and useful to the students.

Theme 2

💬

  • Needs to learn manners and how to talk to people with respect.
  • She is very honest, at times blunt.
  • Often treats others as idiots and with a condescending tone.

Theme 3

📋 About Work & Grades

  • .
  • she will call it AI or .
  • She does grade pretty easy though.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

17

Recent reviews read by the AI

17

Lifetime ratings

74/100

Evidence confidence

The analysis uses 17 reviews across a long span, but only one recent online review and .

Inside 17 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 53
3 out of 55
2 out of 53
1 out of 54

Course coverage

IDES1805 reviews
HIST1803 reviews
IDES110F3 reviews
ARCH1251 review
DRAF1101 review
Show 4 more courses
DRAFDRAF1 review
IDES1001 review
IDES1901 review
IDESCAREERS1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

4

A 4

B range

0

No reported values

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values