AI Rate Professor

English

Anderson Kenneth

ENGL60 · ENGL201 · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
91/100
RMP rating
4.2/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
2.2

The decision

if you want a and manageable work, but do not expect to skip class.

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaringEasy GraderClear FeedbackManageable WorkloadAttendance Matters
  • Most students describe him as caring, fair, and easy to communicate with.
  • as easy or fair, with a manageable workload.
  • though the workload is not heavy.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

86/100

Students repeatedly call him an , so an A looks realistic with and basic effort.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

74/100

The English courses sound approachable because students , and a workload that is not overwhelming.

Only in-person reviews describe course difficulty, so no format comparison is possible.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

Multiple tags warn that skipping class hurts your chance of passing, so .

.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

88/100

Most students strongly recommend him because , and easy to work with.

The recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Generous

90/100

Several students directly describe him as a .

Format shift

.

Workload

Light

82/100

Students say the work is not overwhelming and does not require as much work as expected.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews discuss workload.

Teaching experience

Excellent

86/100

and feedback, though one older review criticizes his monotone and repetition.

Format shift

Teaching .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

, and , so assessment appears assignment-centered.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are , and manageable work.

Main concern

Some students may dislike a repetitive or monotone lecture style.

What students said

“He is great with communication, caring, and wants his students to succeed.”
ENGL201
“Hes a and his class doesnt require as much work.”
ENGL60
“He repeats himself a lot and has a monotone voice that is unbearable.”
ENGL60

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The reviews do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, open-book rules, or .

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, proctoring, open-book rules, or final exam structure.

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“He is great with communication, caring, and wants his students to succeed.”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and workload. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

86/100

“He is great with communication, caring, and wants his students to succeed.”

⚖️

90/100

“ and he actually cares about his students”

📚 Workload

82/100

“The work is not overwhelming if you are taking other classes.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He is great with communication, caring, and wants his students to succeed.
  • He is very easy going and fair.
  • He repeats himself a lot and has a monotone voice that is unbearable.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Hes a and his class doesnt require as much work.
  • and he actually cares about his students
  • The work is not overwhelming if you are taking other classes.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

70/100

Evidence confidence

Five reviews across several years are mostly consistent and specific, but the sample is small and includes one much older negative review.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ENGL604 reviews
ENGL2011 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

2

B 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values