AI Rate Professor

English

Marquis Nave

ENGL60 · ENGLISH60 · ENGLISH103 · ENGL103 · BUAD301 · ENG100F · ENG60 · ENG301 · ENGL100 · ENGLI60 · ENG59 · ENGCOLLEGEW · ENG100 · ENG103 · 50 lifetime ratings

AI rating
45/100
RMP rating
3.8/5
Take again
33.33%
Difficulty
3.4

The decision

Take him if you want serious writing growth and can , and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough essay graderHeavy homeworkImproves writingConfusing promptsEngaging discussions
  • Students often say he can improve writing, especially for motivated learners.
  • , and many students describe him as a .
  • Workload is consistently heavy, with , and journals.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

Getting an A looks difficult because students repeatedly , and a need to work extremely hard.

The single online review says an A may be possible, but the and .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

The writing concepts and prompts are often described as , and demanding.

Online evidence is positive but limited, while as challenging.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

Multiple in-person tags and comments say skipping class is risky and .

Attendance concerns come from in-person reviews; the online .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

52/100

Students recommend him mainly for serious learning, but many warn against him because of , and .

The online review is positive, while .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

25/100

Many students call him a and .

Format shift

; the online review does not clarify grading.

Workload

Heavy

25/100

Students frequently mention lots of , and multiple essays.

Format shift

Heavy workload evidence is mostly in-person, while the single online review gives no workload detail.

Teaching experience

Good

68/100

He is often described as intelligent, funny, and effective for writing growth, but and sometimes unhelpful.

Format shift

, while but detailed.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

Grades appear , and papers rather than traditional exams.

Format shift

; online assessment evidence is unclear.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

49 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews are split between strong praise for writing improvement and , and heavy work.

Main concern

Students who need clear step-by-step writing help may struggle with and prompts.

What students said

“Professor Nave is intelligent and methodical, but and to write about because they each have several components.”
ENG100
“If extremely hard.”
ENGL103
“He helped me improve writing immensely.”
ENG59

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

The only online review is positive about inspiration and learning but still rates difficulty high.

Main concern

Online evidence is too limited to judge workload or .

What students said

“He is very inspirational and is a great speaker.”
ENG301
“You will learn A LOT in his class and I believe you can get an A.”
ENG301

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The clearest exam evidence is an in-class essay final, but reviews do not clearly prove proctoring, open-book status, or .

In-Class Essay FinalNo Midterm MentionedExam policy not clearly proven

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and one course with , but do not clearly prove open-book or proctoring rules.

In-Class Essay FinalNo Midterm Mentioned
“The .”
ENG100
“6 essays total but .”
ENG103

Online

The online review does .

Exam policy not clearly proven

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Yes he is a and might give a lot of homework, but he sure knows how to teach.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and student fit. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

68/100

“He helped me improve writing immensely.”

⚖️

25/100

“Professor Nave is a .”

📚 Workload Pressure

25/100

“If extremely hard.”

👍 Recommendation Fit

52/100

“Take his class if you actually want to learn.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Professor Nave broke down English to an equation and I have never looked back.
  • He teaches you to be a better writer, but you have to do the homework!
  • Not really a hard class but .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • .
  • Most likely won't receive an A btw.
  • and if you didn't do as he said.

Theme 3

📚 About Workload

  • lots of research, reading, and homework.
  • There is something due every class period, often times there were multiple items due.
  • Four essays and two in .

Theme 4

❤️ About Student Fit

  • If you are not lazy and can write a back and easy.
  • If your not good at .
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

50

Lifetime ratings

92/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty reviews across many years give rich and consistent , and workload.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 520
4 out of 511
3 out of 58
2 out of 59
1 out of 52

Course coverage

ENG10012 reviews
ENG608 reviews
ENG1036 reviews
ENG595 reviews
ENGL1033 reviews
Show 10 more courses
ENGL603 reviews
ENG100F2 reviews
ENGL1002 reviews
ENGLISH1032 reviews
ENGLISH602 reviews
109731 review
BUAD3011 review
ENG3011 review
ENGCOLLEGEW1 review
ENGLI601 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

11 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

6

B+ 2 · B 4

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

5

Drop/Withdrawal 3 · Not sure yet 1 · Not_Sure_Yet 1