AI Rate Professor

Film & Television

Victor Phan

14854BIOL · RTVF350 · CRTV127 · CRTVEH · CRTV121 · SCREE127F · CTVA350 · CRTV120F · 21 lifetime ratings

AI rating
76/100
RMP rating
4.0/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
3.4

The decision

Take him if you are serious about film or screenwriting and , and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerFilm industry focusTough graderPassionate lecturerEffort-based rewardsPolarizing style
  • Many students value his real-world film focus and passion.
  • Screenwriting-related courses can be tough, especially because as strict.
  • Students who are serious about film tend to benefit more than casual students.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

Some classes sound manageable with study guides and weekly work, but screenwriting reviews repeatedly warn that .

The online review says effort is recognized, while in-person .

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

Film survey material can be manageable, but serious screenwriting work is demanding and not suited for casual students.

The only online review describes prepared writing projects, while .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

One in-person review as absence, and no review clearly shows broad flexibility.

.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

76/100

, but and a polarizing personality make him a poor fit for some students.

The online review is positive, while but more divided.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

32/100

grader, though some say effort is rewarded.

Format shift

Online grading is described as fair in one review, while .

Workload

Moderate

48/100

Work includes group projects, , and a final.

Format shift

The online review focuses on major writing projects, while , and exams.

Teaching experience

Good

82/100

Most students praise his passion, clarity, humor, and industry realism, but a minority describe him as annoying, discouraging, or ineffective.

Format shift

Both formats are positive on teaching, but .

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Assessments include writing projects, , and tests.

Format shift

The online review emphasizes writing projects, while and exams.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

20 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews are polarized, with strong praise for film passion and help but and difficulty.

Main concern

Several students describe him as a and not ideal for casual learners.

What students said

“ if you are serious about becoming a screen writer because if .”
CRTV127
“He is a .”
CRTV127
“ .”
CTVA350

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

The single online review praises his preparation, responsiveness, and .

Main concern

Online evidence is limited to one review, so format-specific confidence is low.

What students said

“He definitely prepares you for the .”
RTVF350
“ and I think if you try and do all the work he'll see the effort.”
RTVF350

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

, and a final, but do not clearly prove proctoring, open-book rules, or closed-book rules.

Study GuidesMultiple-Choice TestsMidtermFinal

Assessment risk

Standard

60/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

midterm, and a final, but exam security rules are not clearly proven.

Study GuidesMultiple-Choice TestsMidtermFinal
“He gives easy to understand study guides and the tests and multiple choice.”
21967
“3 homework assignments, 1 midterm, 1 final.”
CRTV120F

Online

The online review mentions big writing projects but does not clearly prove quiz, midterm, final, proctoring, webcam, or open-book rules.

Writing Projects
“He definitely prepares you for the .”
RTVF350

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you want to work in the film industry, this is the .”

Voice snapshots generated from 21 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and film-career fit. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

82/100

“Vic is an amazing passionate professor who clearly knows his stuff.”

⚖️

32/100

“He is a .”

👍

76/100

“TAKE if you really want to be a screenwriter.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He makes his class fun and educational at the same time!
  • .
  • You learn more from the book than what you learn from this guy.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Do the homework and you will get a .
  • He is a because he claims the real world won't give you any breaks so he won't.
  • Not hard if you study the study guide.

Theme 3

🎬 About Film Career Value

  • He has an impressive background and loves what he does.
  • Whatever you put into it, you will get out of it and Victor will reward you if you put in the effort.
  • because he really wants to make sure you are taking this industry seriously.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

21

Recent reviews read by the AI

21

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 21 reviews cover many years and include detailed, consistent themes despite some polarization.

Inside 21 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 514
4 out of 51
3 out of 52
2 out of 52
1 out of 52

Course coverage

CRTV12711 reviews
CRTV1212 reviews
121891 review
14854BIOL1 review
219671 review
Show 5 more courses
CRTV120F1 review
CRTVEH1 review
CTVA3501 review
RTVF3501 review
SCREE127F1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values