AI Rate Professor

Child Development

Daniela Arbizzi

CDES238 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
15/100
RMP rating
2.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
5.0

The decision

if you are comfortable with constant group participation and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerHeavy group workLots of homeworkParticipation requiredConfusing expectations
  • The only review reports group work in every class and .
  • The course topic may be interesting, but the student felt consistently wrong and .
  • Evidence is very limited because there is only one in-person review.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

The B- grade, maximum difficulty rating, and effort.

All grade-effort .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

24/100

The topic may be understandable, but frequent group work and .

Only one in-person review describes course challenge.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

Group work occurs .

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

15/100

The and describes a frustrating classroom experience.

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

22/100

The only reported grade is B- in a very difficult class with no signs of .

Format shift

.

Workload

Overwhelming

15/100

The review explicitly reports homework plus group work in every class meeting.

Format shift

Workload evidence .

Teaching experience

Poor

30/100

The student found some meetings fun but felt repeatedly wrong and .

Format shift

Teaching evidence .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

20/100

The review emphasizes group work and .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

The , and a difficult experience.

Main concern

Heavy participation and .

What students said

“Group work In .”
CDES238
“I felt like I was always wrong everyone.”
CDES238

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the final format.

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The policy.

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Group work In .”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 review, highlighting workload and participation concerns. Credibility rating: Low.

📚 Workload Pressure

15/100

“Group work In .”

🎯 Teaching Experience

30/100

“Some class meetings were fun. But some werent.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

15/100

“I felt like I was always wrong everyone.”

Theme 1

👥 About Participation

  • Group work In .
  • During group work everyone talks so have something to say.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • I felt like I was always wrong everyone.
  • Great topic and .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

20/100

Evidence confidence

, so the pattern may not represent the broader student experience.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

CDES2381 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B- 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values