AI Rate Professor

Music

Edgar Rothermich

MUS110 · MUS291 · MUS110F · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
100/100
RMP rating
5.0/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
3.8

The decision

if you want a highly engaging music professor and are willing to show up and keep pace with the work.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerAmazing lecturesDeep subject expertiseHands-on teachingParticipation mattersChallenging but rewarding
  • Students consistently describe him as excellent, knowledgeable, and inspiring.
  • The course , and projects.
  • Grades are strong, but success depends on steady participation and effort.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

70/100

Most students earned A grades, but the comments show that , and projects are required for that outcome.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

The content is concept-heavy and technical, but and hands-on style make it manageable.

All course and electronic music reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

15/100

Multiple reviews say participation matters and missing more than a few classes will set students back.

, and they consistently frame attendance as important.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

98/100

Students unanimously recommend him because he is knowledgeable, inspiring, and unusually invested in teaching well.

Recommendation evidence is entirely in person, and .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

68/100

Grades are strong and , but students describe a real expectation to attend and complete the work.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

45/100

Weekly quizzes, projects, homework, and light.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews mention workload, and they describe consistent work that supports learning.

Teaching experience

Excellent

98/100

Students repeatedly praise his lectures, feedback, expertise, visual materials, and ability to teach different skill levels.

Format shift

All and is consistently excellent.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

35/100

, and projects more than formal exams.

Format shift

The and projects, with no online assessment evidence.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person students strongly , and hands-on teaching while noting that attendance and .

Main concern

Missing class or skipping work can quickly hurt performance.

What students said

“Probably the .”
MUS110
“He assigns weekly quizzes and , but they help you stay on track in the class.”
MUS291
“Plan on going to every class, missing more than a few will set you back a lot.”
MUS110F

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention weekly quizzes and projects, but they do not clearly prove a .

Weekly QuizzesProjectsExam policy not clearly proven

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and projects, but do not clearly prove midterm, final, open-book, closed-book, or proctoring rules.

Weekly QuizzesProjectsExam policy not clearly proven
“He assigns weekly quizzes and , but they help you stay on track in the class.”
MUS291

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Probably the .”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, workload, and attendance. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

98/100

“Rothermich went above and beyond.”

👍 Recommendation Strength

98/100

“If interested in the subject matter of the class, it will be a !”

📚 Workload Reality

45/100

“He assigns weekly quizzes and , but they help you stay on track in the class.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Teaching style was very conceptual and hands on.
  • He uses his own VISUAL reading material (which is AMAZING btw) on top of the required text.
  • Describes any solution in simple or complex terms to get the .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Plan on going to every class, missing more than a few will set you back a lot.
  • He assigns weekly quizzes and , but they help you stay on track in the class.
  • show up and do HW

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • Probably the .
  • Edgar is an excellent professor who both challenges you and inspires .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

78/100

Evidence confidence

Five detailed but older reviews are highly consistent, all in person, and strongly positive.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 55
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

MUS1102 reviews
MUS2912 reviews
MUS110F1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

4

A 4

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values