AI Rate Professor

Engineering

Peter Nezafati

ENGL60 · ENGLISH60 · BUAD301 · ENG60 · ENG100F · ENG098 · ENG100 · ENG103 · 12 lifetime ratings

AI rating
81/100
RMP rating
4.3/5
Take again
71.43%
Difficulty
3.1

The decision

if you want an engaging writing teacher and are willing to participate, revise, and .

Best fit · Effort For RewardInspirational lecturesCaring mentorParticipation mattersWriting feedbackMixed grading clarity
  • Most students praise his energy, humor, and long-term impact.
  • Getting an A usually requires engagement, office hours, and writing to expectations.
  • Online reviews are sharply split, with one strong praise and one serious complaint about guidance and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

Good grades are possible, but students must participate, write to expectations, and .

In-person evidence supports effort-based success, while online evidence is mixed and includes a .

Is the course easy?

Standard

56/100

The writing courses are not conceptually extreme, but , and personal reflection require steady attention.

In-person reviews describe engaging but demanding writing work, while online reviews disagree on clarity and guidance.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

Attendance and participation appear important, with one review directly saying class is mandatory and another warning skipping will hurt performance.

; online reviews only mention participation matters.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

76/100

Most students recommend him for inspiring lectures and personal growth, though a .

, while online reviews are polarized.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

Grades look achievable, but several reviews mention tough grading or needing to match his expectations.

Format shift

, while one online review calls him a .

Workload

Moderate

55/100

Work includes essays, readings, quizzes, and participation, but students do not consistently call it overwhelming.

Format shift

and quizzes, while online comments focus more on videos and delayed papers.

Teaching experience

Good

82/100

Most students call his lectures inspiring, funny, and memorable, despite a minority reporting poor guidance or .

Format shift

, while online feedback is split.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

Comments , and group projects more than major exams.

Format shift

and assignments than traditional exams.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

10 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person students mostly describe him as funny, inspirational, and and effort important.

Main concern

and expectations demanding.

What students said

“MUST TAKE CLASS!”
ENG103
“If you enjoy flying low you will fail.”
ENG100F

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online feedback is split between highly inspiring lectures and poor guidance with .

Main concern

and not useful.

What students said

“I was mesmerized by his awesome lectures.”
ENG100
“ and does nothing to help you improve, so I hired a tutor.”
BUAD301

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention quizzes, readings, writings, papers, and group projects, but they do not clearly prove a .

Quiz Based On ReadingsWriting AssignmentsGroup ProjectsReviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy

Assessment risk

Varies

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and writing assignments, but do not clearly prove a broader exam policy.

Quiz Based On ReadingsWriting AssignmentsExam Policy Not Clearly Proven
“The class .”
ENG100F
“The amount of .”
ENG100

Online

Online reviews mention papers and group projects, but do not clearly .

PapersGroup ProjectsExam Policy Not Clearly Proven
“ .”
BUAD301
“GROUP PROJECTS”
BUAD301

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“MUST TAKE CLASS!”

Voice snapshots generated from 12 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences; credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

82/100

“His lectures were amazing and his energy is unmatched.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

76/100

“ .”

⚖️

55/100

“Dont openly disagree with and write what he says, to get an A.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • His lectures were amazing and his energy is unmatched.
  • professor Nez is great! class is mandatory but all his lectures are interesting and inspirational.
  • Professor Nez is really funny, and it makes you truly think.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • If you enjoy flying low you will fail.
  • As long as and work your all, he'll do so in return for your education.
  • Dont openly disagree with and write what he says, to get an A.

Theme 3

🧭

  • .
  • and I am so grateful that o took his class.
  • and does nothing to help you improve, so I hired a tutor.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

12

Recent reviews read by the AI

12

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Twelve reviews across several years give consistent positive teaching themes with and .

Inside 12 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 59
4 out of 50
3 out of 52
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

BUAD3012 reviews
ENG1002 reviews
ENG1032 reviews
ENGL602 reviews
ENG0981 review
Show 3 more courses
ENG100F1 review
ENG601 review
ENGLISH601 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

9 reported outcomes

A range

4

A+ 1 · A 1 · A- 2

B range

5

B+ 1 · B 3 · B- 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values