AI Rate Professor

Speech Communication

Jennifer Garthoffner

SPCH105 · SPCH100 · SPCH101 · SPEECH100 · SPCH103 · 13 lifetime ratings

AI rating
82/100
RMP rating
3.9/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
2.1

The decision

if you want a and manageable speech class, but do not treat it as automatic credit.

Best fit · Effort For RewardEngaging lecturesClear expectationsEasy with effortExam focusedStrict about attendance
  • Most students describe her as , and able to make speech courses feel manageable.
  • Grades are usually reachable with steady work, but , and .
  • A minority of students found her boring, sarcastic, or condescending.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

An A is realistic if students complete the , and , but it is not effortless.

because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

70/100

The content is generally approachable for speech courses, especially because students say .

All course-easiness evidence comes from in-person reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

35/100

because one review warns that skipping class will hurt performance and others mention participation-heavy class time.

.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

72/100

, though some warn about boredom, tone, and exams.

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

62/100

Students often call the class easy with effort, but and .

Format shift

.

Workload

Light

76/100

Workload is usually described as a , and one group project.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Good

78/100

Most students describe her as , and clear, but a few found her boring or condescending.

Format shift

Teaching evidence .

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

Grades appear , and a final, with exams sometimes carrying heavy weight.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

13 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are mostly positive, with students praising engagement and clear expectations while , and .

Main concern

Some students found the lectures boring or the tone sarcastic and rude.

What students said

“Always keeps you engaged and really encourages student participation.”
SPCH105
“Can be an easy A, .”
SPCH100
“Her lectures were pretty boring.”
SPCH100

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews clearly mention quizzes, tests, a midterm, and a final, but .

MidtermFinalQuizzesTests

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and tests, but do not clearly prove book policy or proctoring rules.

MidtermFinalQuizzesTests
“study for .”
SPCH100
“One group project, 2 homework assignments, 3 quizzes & 3 tests.”
SPCH105
“Midterm and the class before.”
SPEECH100

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you want an A, it's not difficult to accomplish.”

Voice snapshots generated from 13 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and workload. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

78/100

“She knows the subject well and .”

📈 Grade Outlook

78/100

“If you want an A, it's not difficult to accomplish.”

⚠️ Main Concern

35/100

“Her lectures were pretty boring.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Always keeps you engaged and really encourages student participation.
  • She keeps class interesting and funny, insisting on a first name basis for everyone.
  • Her lectures were pretty boring.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Can be an easy A, .
  • Easy teacher if you do the work
  • She is perfectly clear on what she wants from your speeches, but she also expects quality.

Theme 3

📝

  • study for .
  • One group project, 2 homework assignments, 3 quizzes & 3 tests.
  • and a group project.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

13

Recent reviews read by the AI

13

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Thirteen in-person reviews across many years give consistent detail , and classroom tone.

Inside 13 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 56
4 out of 54
3 out of 52
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

SPCH1005 reviews
SPCH1055 reviews
SPCH1011 review
SPCH1031 review
SPEECH1001 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values