AI Rate Professor

Child Development

Patricia Green Pappas

CDES123A · CLD112 · CDFL123DF · CDES238 · CDES123 · CDESCDES · INTROECHD115 · CDESDF · CEDS123 · CDES122 · CDES225 · CREATIVEARTS · CDES118 · INTROTOCURRIC · CDES115 · CDES1 · 36 lifetime ratings

AI rating
18/100
RMP rating
2.5/5
Take again
33.33%
Difficulty
3.1

The decision

unless , and a highly independent learning style.

Best fit · Self Taught ProDisorganizedUnclear assignmentsRude toneHard graderHeavy homework
  • The dominant complaint is unclear, disorganized instruction with changing or vague assignment expectations.
  • Many students describe harsh or , and poor respect for students.
  • A smaller group values her passion for child development and her independent, creative teaching style.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

Some students earned A grades, but many describe harsh, unclear, or .

because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

The child development content is not always described as conceptually hard, but and disorganization make the course harder to manage.

Only in-person reviews discuss course difficulty.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

12/100

because one review says it is 20% of the grade and several say students must stay for the full class.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

28/100

Most students warn against taking her because of , and .

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

18/100

Students repeatedly report hard , and penalties for minor details.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

25/100

Reviews mention many papers, lots of , and unclear work expectations.

Format shift

Workload .

Teaching experience

Poor

25/100

Most reviews describe her as unclear, disorganized, rude, and and experience.

Format shift

Teaching .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

Comments , and assignment expectations than on exams.

Format shift

Assessment .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

36 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

instructions, disorganization, rude tone, hard grading, and heavy or confusing assignments.

Main concern

Students repeatedly say assignments and and inconsistent.

What students said

“ and unorganized.”
CDES115
“ . Contradicts herself all the time!”
CDES1
“She is extremely rude and disrespectful of her students”
CDES225

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention a and some tests, but do not clearly prove book policy, proctoring rules, or .

Large FinalExam MentionedParticipation Grade

Assessment risk

Strict

30/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews mention a 350-question final and tests, but reviews do not clearly prove open-book, closed-book, or proctoring policy.

Large FinalTestsParticipation Grade
“The final itself for CDES 122 is 350 question.”
CDES122
“Attendance is 20% of grade.”
CDES115
“You can ace the tests and somehow get a C or and end up with an F in class.”
CDES115

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ and unorganized.”

Voice snapshots generated from 36 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and student treatment. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

25/100

“There is no method to her way of teaching and she's super arrogant.”

⚖️

18/100

“ as to why you get what you get and she will make you feel dumb without saying it.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

28/100

“ . Save your GPA.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and unorganized.
  • . Contradicts herself all the time!
  • She never gives instruction clearly.
  • She knows the material she teaches and has a passion for interpersonal communications.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • She is an .
  • Everything you turn in is only 4 points, even super hard/time consuming stuff and super easy stuff.
  • Grades or based on how much she likes you.
  • Participate, Listen, do your work with quality and you will get an A!

Theme 3

⚠️ About Student Experience

  • She is extremely rude and disrespectful of her students
  • Makes each student feel dumb.
  • .
  • I have taken 3 of her courses and I think she is a wonderful teacher.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

36

Recent reviews read by the AI

36

Lifetime ratings

92/100

Evidence confidence

and consistent evidence, even with a small positive minority.

Inside 36 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 55
4 out of 57
3 out of 53
2 out of 57
1 out of 514

Course coverage

CDES11515 reviews
CDES1223 reviews
CDES1233 reviews
CREATIVEARTS2 reviews
124801 review
Show 12 more courses
CDES11 review
CDES1181 review
CDES123A1 review
CDES2251 review
CDES2381 review
CDESCDES1 review
CDESDF1 review
CDFL123DF1 review
CEDS1231 review
CLD1121 review
INTROECHD1151 review
INTROTOCURRIC1 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 1