AI Rate Professor

Art

Nanci Shrieber-Smith

ARTHIST · ART110 · ART100 · ART110F · 7 lifetime ratings

AI rating
66/100
RMP rating
3.7/5
Take again
33.33%
Difficulty
3.1

The decision

Take her if you like structured lecture courses and , but if strict attendance and test-heavy memorization frustrate you.

Best fit · Effort For RewardLecture heavyTest heavyExtra creditStrict attendancePolarizing teacher
  • Student experiences are split between highly enthusiastic praise and strong complaints about strict, boring lectures.
  • and memorization-based, but appears common and helpful.
  • Attendance and participation matter, and at least .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

An A is possible with work and , but tests, memorization, participation, and .

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Standard

51/100

The material is manageable for some students but can feel difficult because of long lectures, memorization, and .

Only in-person reviews describe course difficulty.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

because reviews say she tracks it and students will not pass if .

.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

55/100

Recommendations are mixed because some students call her great while others describe the class as miserable and overly strict.

All recommendation evidence is in person, with no online comparison.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

because helps, but tests are demanding and one student received an F.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

Workload is moderate because reviews mention tests, quizzes, reading, a museum report, a large project, and optional .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Average

62/100

Teaching quality is polarizing, with strong praise for enthusiasm and art appreciation balanced by complaints about boring lectures and poor review support.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

Assessments lean heavily toward tests and quizzes, with reports, projects, reading, and also present.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

7 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are mixed, with several students loving her energy and while others criticize strict attendance, long lectures, and .

Main concern

The main risk is a .

What students said

“She made my first experience learning Art miserable.”
ART100
“ opportunity helped many people as she gives a lot.”
ART100
“Easy if you do the work.”
ART110

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews describe a test-heavy and memorization-heavy structure, but do not clearly prove open-book, proctoring, webcam, or closed-book policies.

Test HeavyLengthy TestsMemorizationQuizzes And Exams

Assessment risk

Standard

42/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews describe lengthy, difficult, lecture-and-book-based tests with quizzes and exams.

Test HeavyLengthy TestsMemorizationQuizzes And Exams
“She is way too strict and .”
ART100
“The and makes us memorize a lot of difficult material without reviewing it with us.”
ART100
“Other then 1 three-paged required museum report and a bunch of , and quizzes and exams.”
ART110F

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Easy if you do the work. I loved the class. Great teacher!”

Voice snapshots generated from 7 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and attendance. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

62/100

“A great art teacher for sure.”

📈 Grade Effort

62/100

“Easy if you do the work.”

🧪

42/100

“The and makes us memorize a lot of difficult material without reviewing it with us.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Lectures were always entertaining for sure
  • Her lectures are long and boring and hard to sit through.
  • She is fun, exciting, and is great at what she does.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • opportunity helped many people as she gives a lot.
  • Easy if you do the work.
  • She's a nice teacher but not a push over.

Theme 3

📝

  • She keeps track of and has her favorites.
  • She is way too strict and .
  • Majority of and some coming from the book

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

7

Recent reviews read by the AI

7

Lifetime ratings

68/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is medium because and contain detailed but conflicting experiences.

Inside 7 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ART1003 reviews
ART1102 reviews
ART110F1 review
ARTHIST1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values