AI Rate Professor

Chemistry

Jim Brady

CHEM101 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
25/100
RMP rating
1.7/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
2.7

The decision

unless you can learn chemistry mostly on your own and tolerate a disorganized class.

Best fit · Self Taught ProUnorganizedPoor preparationSelf-teaching requiredUnhelpfulLarge point cushion
  • Students consistently describe the class as disorganized and poorly prepared.
  • High grades were possible, but students say they earned them by teaching themselves.
  • All reviewers .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

64/100

Good grades are possible because , but students describe self-teaching as the real cost.

All grade evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

The course is not described as conceptually impossible, but poor organization makes key chemistry topics harder to learn.

Only in-person reviews describe the course difficulty.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do not clearly .

No online or .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

12/100

because the , and dependent on self-teaching.

All recommendation evidence comes from in-person reviews, and every reviewer .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

72/100

Students earned high grades and .

Format shift

when learning is weak.

Workload

Moderate

50/100

Workload evidence is limited, though one tag mentions many papers and .

Format shift

and labs.

Teaching experience

Poor

24/100

Reviews repeatedly describe him as , and not helpful with important material.

Format shift

Teaching .

Assessment method

Balanced

60/100

, and tests, but do not give a .

Format shift

and tests.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are consistently negative, focusing on disorganization, weak teaching, and .

Main concern

.

What students said

“ well enough to teach it.”
CHEM101
“The only way I passed was because I have taken a previous chem class.”
CHEM101
“Take another teacher if possible.”
CHEM101

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention tests and poor preparation for tested topics, but do not clearly prove open-book rules, webcam use, or strict proctoring.

TestsPoor Test PreparationLarge Point Cushion

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews say important topics appeared on tests after being skimmed, while .

TestsPoor Test PreparationLarge Point Cushion
“He skimmed over important topics that would be on the test.”
CHEM101
“The only thing that saved me was the large amount of .”
CHEM101
“for the and most of the .”
CHEM101

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Take another teacher if possible.”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

24/100

“ well enough to teach it.”

👎 Recommendation Rate

12/100

“Take another teacher if possible.”

⚖️

72/100

“The only thing that saved me was the large amount of .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He doesnt put a lot of effort into teaching new things and could care less if you failed or passed.
  • because of his lack of preparation.
  • .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • I was able to get an A by teaching myself but I wish I would have taken the class with another professor for a better experience.
  • The only way I passed was because I have taken a previous chem class.
  • for the and most of the .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

, but they are detailed and highly consistent.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 52
1 out of 51

Course coverage

CHEM1013 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

2

A+ 1 · A 1

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values