AI Rate Professor

Philosophy

Joe Conti

PHIL105 · PHIL11032 · PHIL105F · PHIL101 · 8 lifetime ratings

AI rating
67/100
RMP rating
3.2/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
2.1

The decision

if you can tolerate disorganization and want a fairly easy grade through Q&A memorization.

Best fit · Easy A HunterInspirational lecturerDisorganized courseQ&A-based examsEasy gradingMinimal book value
  • Students split sharply between loving his inspirational lectures and criticizing serious disorganization.
  • Grades are often easy if students memorize posted Q&As and complete limited written work.
  • Several reviews say lectures may be meaningful but not always aligned with exams.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

84/100

Students repeatedly say grades are easy if you memorize the Q&As and complete the small amount of written work.

because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

74/100

The content is approachable and exam-focused, though disorganized Q&As .

because there are no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

68/100

because students mention skipping and allowed absences, but one review says grades can be docked after too many absences.

because there are no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

55/100

Recommendation depends on whether students value inspirational lectures more than they dislike disorganization.

All because there are no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

82/100

Students report easy journal grading, simple test questions, passing despite poor tests, and a .

Format shift

because there are no online reviews.

Workload

Light

78/100

The workload appears light, with exams based on Q&As, few papers or journals, and little need for the book.

Format shift

All because there are no online reviews.

Teaching experience

Average

62/100

His lectures can be inspirational and thoughtful, but disorganization repeatedly weakens the classroom experience.

Format shift

All because there are no online reviews.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

76/100

Assessment centers on Q&A-based exams with some journals, essays, or one paper depending on the class.

Format shift

All because there are no online reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

8 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

but disorganized professor whose exams are usually manageable through posted Q&As.

Main concern

The , and exam confusion.

What students said

“ .”
PHIL105
“Great lecturer, show-up to class memories his posted Q&A and youll get an A”
PHIL105F
“This class is an easy A if you can memorize everything he writes on the Q&A's and do the two journals he assigns for the semester.”
PHIL105

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

&As and are often easy, but they do not clearly prove open-book, closed-book, or proctoring policies.

Q&A-Based ExamsSimple Test QuestionsFew TestsOne Paper Mentioned

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

78/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

usually manageable, though sometimes disorganized or mismatched.

Q&A-Based ExamsSimple Test QuestionsDisorganized Exam Items
“ &As posted online”
PHIL105
“Grades easily on the journals and .”
PHIL105
“ , and he posts those a so you can study.”
PHIL101

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“This class is an easy A if you can memorize everything he writes on the Q&A's and do the two journals he assigns for the semester.”

Voice snapshots generated from 8 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and organization. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

62/100

“He's a great thinker and speaker, but horrible editor.”

📈 Easy Grade Path

84/100

“Great lecturer, show-up to class memories his posted Q&A and youll get an A”

⚠️ Organization Risk

45/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Great lecturer, show-up to class memories his posted Q&A and youll get an A
  • His lectures are pretty inspirational though!
  • He opens your eyes and is so passionate about what he teaches.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty And Grades

  • This class is an easy A if you can memorize everything he writes on the Q&A's and do the two journals he assigns for the semester.
  • and still pass.
  • and we only had 1 paper to write.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Organization

  • Lectures are messy.
  • His Q&As are really convoluted and poorly assembled and dispersed out of sink with the study plan;
  • Sometimes he messes up our exams or stuff with other classes, forgets class end time and the date of the day etc.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

8

Recent reviews read by the AI

8

Lifetime ratings

66/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is medium because only 8 in-person reviews are available, but they give detailed and consistent evidence about lectures, Q&As, and disorganization.

Inside 8 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 52
3 out of 52
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

PHIL1054 reviews
PHIL1012 reviews
PHIL105F1 review
PHIL110321 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

6 reported outcomes

A range

3

A 3

B range

3

B+ 3

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values