AI Rate Professor

Graphic Arts

Dolores Jenerson-Madden

ACG180 · DART180F · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
67/100
RMP rating
4.3/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

if you are interested in graphic arts and willing to work through a demanding, hands-on course.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerCaringEnjoyable CourseDifficult ContentParticipation Matters
  • Students describe Jenerson-Madden as caring and enjoyable.
  • The course content can be difficult, especially for students not committed to editing or graphics.
  • clarity.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

The reviews suggest strong grades require real effort because the course can be very difficult and participation matters.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

The course involves difficult editing and graphics work, even though students may find it interesting.

, so no format difference can be judged.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

20/100

Tags indicate participation matters and skipping class hurts success.

, and they suggest attendance matters.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

88/100

Students recommend her because she is caring and makes a difficult course enjoyable and interesting.

All .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

50/100

There is , but the difficulty ratings suggest students must earn their grades.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

30/100

The class is described as very difficult and hands-on, with graphics, editing, camera work, and green screen tasks.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Good

78/100

Students see her as caring and enjoyable, though .

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

20/100

and editing work rather than exams.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

and course interest, while warning that the class can be difficult.

Main concern

The class may be too difficult for students without real interest in the field.

What students said

“Dolores was a .”
DART180F
“This is a very difficult class so unless you want to become an editor think twice.”
ACG180

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The reviews do not clearly describe exams, proctoring, open-book rules, or .

Reviews do not clearly prove an exam policy

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

policy.

No clear exam evidence

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“This is a very difficult class so unless you want to become an editor think twice.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and course difficulty. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

78/100

“Dolores was a .”

📚 Course Difficulty

28/100

“being one of the most difficult courses I ever took it was by far the most enjoyable and interesting.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

88/100

“I would love to have her as a prof again.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Dolores was a .
  • Her lectures are kinda basic and as well as she should

Theme 2

📚 About Difficulty & Interest

  • This is a very difficult class so unless you want to become an editor think twice.
  • Graphics, editing, some camera work and green screen were just some of the things utilized.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

35/100

Evidence confidence

, and one is much older, so confidence is limited.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ACG1801 review
DART180F1 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values