AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Lorena Castillo

MATH141 · F10 · MATH030 · MATH010 · MATH80 · MATH20 · MATH12 · MATH15 · MATH40F · MATH10 · MATH130 · MATH100 · 24 lifetime ratings

AI rating
28/100
RMP rating
2.8/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

unless you can handle , and learning independently when lectures feel unclear.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerFast PacedUnorganized LecturesHeavy HomeworkDifficult TestsPolarizing Teacher
  • Reviews are sharply split, with some students finding her helpful and others calling the class confusing.
  • Negative comments repeatedly mention , and exams unlike homework.
  • The course is risky for students who need slow, structured math instruction.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

An A does not look easy because students report , and harsh penalties for .

because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

30/100

Math concepts become harder because lectures are often described as , and mismatched with .

because there are no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

20/100

Students say , and tags warn that skipping class can lead to failure.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

38/100

Recommendation is low because many students describe disorganization, rushed teaching, and .

All .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

25/100

Students report , and large point losses for single missed problems.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

22/100

as excessive, time-consuming, and different from class examples.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Poor

42/100

Some students praise her patience, but , and .

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

75/100

, and exam difficulty, with exams carrying the biggest student anxiety.

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

24 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews are highly polarized, but the dominant risk is rushed and and .

Main concern

Students and .

What students said

“ and way too fast paced.”
MATH141
“Very fast, hard to understand.”
MATH20

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews describe difficult tests that often differ from homework, but do .

Difficult TestsTests Unlike HomeworkHigh Penalty Questions

Assessment risk

Strict

28/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person , but do not clearly prove closed-book or proctoring rules.

Difficult TestsTests Unlike HomeworkHigh Penalty Questions
“ .”
MATH141
“ and if that question was wrong -10%-15% on the exam”
MATH130

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ and way too fast paced.”

Voice snapshots generated from 24 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, workload, and . Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

42/100

“ .”

📚 Workload Pressure

22/100

“I spend more than 50 hrs doing hm and failed so I quit”

🧪 Test Difficulty

28/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👩‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and way too fast paced.
  • She rushes through every concept.
  • She made it so easy by explaining everything and making it so straightforward.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • many hours doing hm and hm totally different from she teach
  • i put in over 85 hours during the and study.
  • .

Theme 3

⚠️ About Student Experience

  • !!!!!!!
  • if you're serious about wanting to learn.
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

24

Recent reviews read by the AI

24

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Twenty-four reviews over many years give rich evidence, though opinions are polarized and several older reviews are less detailed.

Inside 24 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 58
4 out of 51
3 out of 53
2 out of 54
1 out of 58

Course coverage

MATH206 reviews
MATH103 reviews
MATH1003 reviews
MATH153 reviews
MATH0102 reviews
Show 7 more courses
F101 review
MATH0301 review
MATH121 review
MATH1301 review
MATH1411 review
MATH40F1 review
MATH801 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

1

A- 1

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values