AI Rate Professor

English As A Second Language

Daniela Guevara

ESL186 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
91/100
RMP rating
5.0/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

if you want a well-prepared and rewards steady effort.

Best fit · Effort For RewardGreat feedbackClear criteriaCareful preparationParticipation matters
  • Both reviews are strongly positive and .
  • Students highlight careful lesson preparation, useful feedback, and .
  • The difficulty is moderate, so improvement likely requires active participation and effort.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

Grades are strong, but the difficulty ratings and participation tags suggest students earn grades through real effort.

All grade-effort evidence comes from two in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

The course appears moderately challenging because students praise improvement and .

Only in-person reviews describe course difficulty.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

45/100

Participation matters in both reviews, but there is .

In-person reviews mention participation, while no online evidence exists.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

92/100

Students recommend her because , and .

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

60/100

, but the B grade and moderate difficulty do not show unusually lenient grading.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

50/100

Reviews do not mention heavy workload, but participation and writing improvement imply steady work.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Excellent

93/100

Students describe her as , and .

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

The comments emphasize writing skills, feedback, participation, and .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are very positive, , and writing improvement.

Main concern

Participation matters and the class is not described as effortless.

What students said

“She prepares , and .”
ESL186
“If you want to improve writing skill. .”
ESL186
“Awesome :)”
ESL186

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove quiz, midterm, final, proctoring, open-book, or .

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

policy or .

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She prepares , and .”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and participation. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

93/100

“She is a great teacher.”

📝

92/100

“She prepares , and .”

👍 Recommendation Rate

92/100

“If you want to improve writing skill. .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She is a great teacher.
  • She prepares , and .

Theme 2

📈 About Effort & Improvement

  • If you want to improve writing skill. .
  • Awesome :)

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

42/100

Evidence confidence

, so the but the sample is small.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ESL1862 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values