AI Rate Professor

Paralegal

Loretta Calvert

PLEG104 · PLEG105 · PLEG101 · 13 lifetime ratings

AI rating
68/100
RMP rating
4.1/5
Take again
71.43%
Difficulty
2.7

The decision

and real-world value, but be cautious with the online format.

Best fit · Effort For RewardGreat in personOnline disorganizedCaring and accessibleWriting heavyTough but useful
  • In-person students usually praise Calvert as , and connected to real-world paralegal work.
  • Online reviews are mixed to negative, with , and workload.
  • Strong grades are possible, but legal writing and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

61/100

Good grades are common, but students say strong results require studying, writing, rewriting, and steady work.

, while online reviews describe heavier confusion and workload.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

The legal material is useful but can be hard, terminology-heavy, and demanding in writing courses.

In-person classes feel clearer and more manageable, while online classes are described as .

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

58/100

Participation and , but reviews do not prove a .

, while online reviews focus on weekly posts and quizzes.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

72/100

because students value her support, clarity, and real-world examples.

, while online reviews are much less reliable and .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

Students call her fair and supportive, but and .

Format shift

In-person grading is tough but educational, while .

Workload

Heavy

34/100

Workload can be heavy, especially with , and long writing assignments.

Format shift

Online reviews stress weekly volume, while and revisions.

Teaching experience

Good

78/100

In-person teaching is highly praised, but online disorganization pulls the overall experience down.

Format shift

and engaging, while online delivery is inconsistent and often criticized.

Assessment method

Balanced

48/100

Assessments , and writing assignments.

Format shift

Online reviews mention weekly quizzes and projects, while and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

10 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

support, clear teaching, real-world examples, and engaging lectures.

Main concern

The classes can be hard, writing-heavy, and sometimes toughly graded.

What students said

“in and gives lots of real-world examples.”
PLEG105
“Must work hard to get good grade.”
PLEG105

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are mixed, with one positive review but two strong complaints about workload, disorganization, and weak communication.

Main concern

, and heavy weekly work.

What students said

“this course was so .”
PLEG101
“Read 2 chapters (40-60 pages), post and .”
PLEG101

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and incomplete, with quizzes and exams mentioned but only one in-person review clearly noting that tests are sometimes open book.

QuizzesExamsSometimes Open BookProjects and Essays

Assessment risk

Varies

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and tests that require studying, with one review saying tests are sometimes open book.

Tests Require StudySometimes Open Book
“ but thankfully the material is interesting.”
PLEG101
“but sometimes its open book”
PLEG101

Online

Online reviews mention quizzes and exams, but they do not clearly prove open-book rules, proctoring, webcam use, or .

Weekly QuizzesExams Mentioned
“Read 2 chapters (40-60 pages), post and .”
PLEG101
“a few quizzes and exams.”
PLEG101

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“The difference between her online classes and in person classes are night and day.”

Voice snapshots generated from 13 reviews, highlighting key themes in format differences, teaching quality, workload, and grading. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

78/100

“in and gives lots of real-world examples.”

💻 Format Difference

72/100

“ but in person she's very informative”

📚 Workload Reality

34/100

“Took me about 4 weeks for .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She's extremely tolerant to even the most mundane of questions and is highly intelligent.
  • Her lectures are absolutely fulfilling and she keeps every student engaged with her quick wits and humor.

Theme 2

💻 About Online Format

  • this course was so .
  • Not worth the .

Theme 3

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • Must work hard to get good grade.
  • she is a but these are legal based classes she has to be

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

13

Recent reviews read by the AI

13

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Thirteen reviews across online and strong format split.

Inside 13 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 58
4 out of 53
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

PLEG1019 reviews
PLEG1053 reviews
PLEG1041 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

9 reported outcomes

A range

5

A+ 2 · A 3

B range

4

B+ 2 · B 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values