AI Rate Professor

Anthropology

Janell Mort

ANTH103 · ANTH101HY · ANTH101 · ANTH102 · 11 lifetime ratings

AI rating
87/100
RMP rating
4.2/5
Take again
87.5%
Difficulty
2.4

The decision

if you can keep up with , and attendance for a fair anthropology class with reachable grades.

Best fit · Effort For RewardAccessibleLecture and video heavyStudy-guide examsFlexibleExtra credit
  • Students generally describe her as , and helpful.
  • The class is manageable because exams align with books, vocabulary, and study guides, with or .
  • Some students find lectures long or dull, and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

80/100

An A is realistic with , and study guides, helped by and curves in some sections.

Online reviews stress keeping up weekly, while , and attendance rules.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

70/100

The content is manageable and often simple, but lectures, reading, writing, and .

Online evidence notes some confusion, while and long lectures.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

32/100

Attendance is not fully flexible because reviews , and a three-absence limit.

Both online and in-person reviews giving the clearest absence limit.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

86/100

Most students recommend her because , and fair despite some dull lectures.

Online and in-person reviews are both mostly positive, though .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

82/100

because exams use study guides or vocab, and reviews mention , curves, and flexible policies.

Format shift

, while online reviews support high scores through reading and homework.

Workload

Moderate

60/100

The workload , and lectures, but students usually describe it as manageable.

Format shift

Online reviews mention weekly homework, while , and class attendance.

Teaching experience

Good

82/100

She is knowledgeable, accessible, and respectful, though some students find lectures dull, long, or .

Format shift

Online reviews are mixed but mostly positive, while and lecture-heavy delivery.

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

Grades appear based , and projects.

Format shift

Online reviews mention homework and tests, while , and projects.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

9 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

lectures, videos, papers, quizzes, exams, and attendance expectations.

Main concern

Lectures can be lengthy or boring, and .

What students said

“All of and a study guide provided.”
ANTH101
“She treats her students with respect, but the lectures can be a bit dull.”
ANTH102
“can only miss 3 days.”
ANTH103

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online and hybrid reviews say the class is manageable if students keep up with , and lectures.

Main concern

and occasional confusion require steady pacing.

What students said

“found it to be an easy class if you just keep up with homework and show up to lectures.”
ANTH101
“ , but her enthusiasm for archaeology balances it out.”
ANTH103

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams seem student-manageable with study guides, reading, vocab, and possible curves, but reviews .

Study Guide ExamsBook-Based TestsCurved ExamsTwo Tests And FinalUnclear Proctoring

Assessment risk

Standard

72/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

book, study guides, and vocab, with curves mentioned in one review.

Study Guide ExamsBook-Based TestsCurved Exams
“All of and a study guide provided.”
ANTH101
“ ”
ANTH103
“The your vocab.”
ANTH102

Online

Online reviews mention two tests and a final with high scores possible from reading, but .

Two Tests And FinalReading-Based TestsUnclear Proctoring
“ and the final.”
ANTH103
“If you read the chapters you will have no problem .”
ANTH103

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Great professor. Really easygoing and very knowledgeable in her field.”

Voice snapshots generated from 11 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

Teaching Quality

82/100

“She is very accessible outside of class which I think are qualities in a good professor.”

82/100

“ ”

Workload Balance

60/100

“ , but it's only a couple of questions.”

Theme 1

About Teaching Style

  • Great professor. Really easygoing and very knowledgeable in her field.
  • She treats her students with respect, but the lectures can be a bit dull.
  • She goes over every subject brilliantly and has field experience.

Theme 2

About Difficulty and Grades

  • As long as you study that you should be able to pass.
  • The your vocab.
  • If you read the chapters you will have no problem .

Theme 3

and Work

  • can only miss 3 days.
  • She takes roll and that counts as part of participation grade.
  • there was a lot of writing which I enjoyed

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

11

Recent reviews read by the AI

11

Lifetime ratings

76/100

Evidence confidence

There are 11 reviews across both formats with useful detail, but online evidence is limited to two reviews and opinions on lecture quality vary.

Inside 11 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 55
4 out of 54
3 out of 52
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ANTH1014 reviews
ANTH1023 reviews
ANTH1033 reviews
ANTH101HY1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

8 reported outcomes

A range

4

A 4

B range

4

B+ 1 · B 3

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values