AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Mark Acuff

MATHM05 · MATH125 · MATH015 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
19/100
RMP rating
2.7/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

Avoid unless and and strict grading.

Best fit · Self Taught ProConfusing lecturesHard graderNeeds tutorStep skippingAttendance matters
  • Two recent reviews describe , skipped steps, hard grading, and needing a tutor.
  • The only positive review is old and gives little detail beyond attending and taking notes.
  • The course may be passable with attendance, but the teaching and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

Getting an A looks difficult because students report , and .

because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

The math content becomes harder because and lectures are difficult to follow.

All course .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

20/100

One tag says skipping class means you will not pass, and positive evidence depends on showing up and taking notes.

, and they make attendance sound important.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

22/100

Students mostly do not recommend him because unclear teaching and .

All recommendation evidence is in person, with .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

18/100

Students describe him as a shown.

Format shift

, and the strongest evidence is negative.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

The workload is described as lots of homework and difficult enough to require tutoring.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Poor

32/100

Recent students say he lectures unclearly, skips steps, blocks the board, and is hard to understand.

Format shift

Only in-person teaching evidence exists, and it is mostly negative.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Reviews mention homework and grading but do .

Format shift

In-person comments provide limited assessment detail, and there is no online evidence.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person evidence is limited but mostly negative, with and .

Main concern

Students may need outside tutoring because and .

What students said

“I needed a tutor he doesn't teach”
MATH125
“I sat close to the board and showed up every day but quickly found myself needing a tutor.”
MATHM05

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the .

Exam Policy Not ClearHard Grading

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, but grading on math work is described as strict.

Exam Policy Not ClearHard Grading
“ if you show work if you happen to get answer wrong”
MATH125

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I needed a tutor he doesn't teach, he just lectures when giving examples on board he skips steps to solution so as to how he got the answer.”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

32/100

“Very hard to understand and not personab”

⚖️

18/100

“He is a if you show work”

📚 Workload Risk

28/100

“LOTS OF HOMEWORK”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • he just lectures when giving examples on board he skips steps to solution
  • Very hard to understand and not personab
  • he often would stand directly in front of what he was writing

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • He is a if you show work
  • I sat close to the board and showed up every day but quickly found myself needing a tutor.
  • If you show up class and .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

38/100

Evidence confidence

Only three reviews exist, with two recent detailed negatives and one older vague positive.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

MATH0151 review
MATH1251 review
MATHM051 review

Reported outcomes

C range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

2

C 2

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values