AI Rate Professor

Environmental Studies

Carolyn Heath

ENVS142 · ENVS105 · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
75/100
RMP rating
4.4/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

Take her if you value hands-on environmental learning and and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerLong HomeworkDifficult ExamsField LearningSupportive TeacherPassionate Lecturer
  • Students praise her passion, real-world examples, field learning, and willingness to help.
  • ENVS105 appears demanding because and .
  • Field-based ENVS142 is more enjoyable and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

A's are possible, especially in field classes, but ENVS105 requires long homework, reading, and .

All evidence is in person, with ENVS142 looking easier and ENVS105 looking more demanding.

Is the course easy?

Standard

52/100

The material is made clearer through examples and field work, but exams and .

Only in-person reviews exist, and difficulty varies by course.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

55/100

as strictly policed, but field trips, participation, and lecture support make showing up important.

and lecture classes.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

74/100

Students value her passion and support, but the workload and .

, though one ENVS105 student would not take her again.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

48/100

because exams are difficult, though homework and support can help prepared students.

Format shift

All grading evidence comes from in-person reviews, especially ENVS105.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Multiple reviews call the work helps with exams.

Format shift

In-person ENVS105 reviews drive the heavy workload rating, while ENVS142 sounds lighter and more experiential.

Teaching experience

Good

82/100

Students consistently describe her as passionate, helpful, and good at making environmental topics real.

Format shift

Teaching and field-class reviews.

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

, and exams, so assessment is mixed rather than purely exam-based.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews describe assessments.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews describe a passionate and supportive professor whose field classes are engaging but whose lecture and .

Main concern

ENVS105 has long homework sets and difficult exams.

What students said

“ . .”
ENVS105
“ !”
ENVS142

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The clearest exam evidence says ENVS105 exams are extremely difficult and require reading and serious preparation.

Difficult ExamsReading RequiredHomework Helps Tests

Assessment risk

Strict

34/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews support difficult ENVS105 exams, but do not .

Difficult ExamsReading Required
“ .”
ENVS105
“Need to read the book and spend a good amount of time in order to pass the exam.”
ENVS105

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ . .”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

82/100

“Very easy to talk to and get help.”

📚 Workload Reality

28/100

“ but .”

🧪 Field Learning

74/100

“Lots of time in nature, seeing, talking, doing field science.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Very easy to talk to and get help.
  • She asks class for and not many of my teachers do that.
  • Both really love what they teach.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • . .
  • but help me for tests.
  • Really makes u work hard to pass the class.

Theme 3

🌿 About Field Experience

  • Fun kayaking and snorkeling!
  • Really gave me the feel for what environmental studies would be like for a major and career.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Five in-person reviews across two courses provide consistent detail about teaching, workload, and course differences.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ENVS1053 reviews
ENVS1422 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values