AI Rate Professor

Physical Education

Mark Sheffield

PE158F · PE219 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
100/100
RMP rating
5.0/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

Take Mark Sheffield if you want a , and .

Best fit · Beginner FriendlySupportive CoachPersonalized FeedbackLaid-Back StyleRespected Instructor
  • Students describe Mark Sheffield as supportive, respectful, and highly effective as a coach.
  • The class appears engaging and personalized, with and custom plans.
  • Evidence is excellent but .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

85/100

Both reported grades are A+, and comments suggest the .

All grade and effort evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

74/100

The class requires participation and physical engagement, but his support and .

Only in-person reviews exist, so no online comparison is possible.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

55/100

Participation appears important, but comments do not prove a .

and comments.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

98/100

Students strongly recommend him because , and gives useful personalized guidance.

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Generous

88/100

Both recorded grades are A+, and .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

62/100

The workload likely involves active participation and training, but comments do not describe it as overwhelming.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews describe the class experience.

Teaching experience

Excellent

98/100

Students praise his , and laid-back style.

Format shift

Only in-person teaching evidence exists.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

15/100

Comments focus on participation, coaching, body scans, and personalized plans rather than exams.

Format shift

Only in-person comments mention assessment-related activity.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person students praise his supportive coaching, personalized plans, and laid-back but .

Main concern

The evidence is very positive but based on only two reviews.

What students said

“He'll design a custom plan just for you, whether it's fat burning, or stronger back, or weight lifting.”
PE158F
“He will work with you, and it not pushy.”
PE158F
“His coaching style is to the point and yet laid back.”
PE219

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, open-book rules, or .

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, proctoring, open-book rules, or final requirements.

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“He'll design a custom plan just for you, whether it's fat burning, or stronger back, or weight lifting.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting key themes in coaching, support, and recommendation strength. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

98/100

“He will work with you, and it not pushy.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

98/100

“forget it and take his class.”

💬

94/100

“His coaching style is to the point and yet laid back.”

Theme 1

🏋️ About Coaching Style

  • He'll design a custom plan just for you, whether it's fat burning, or stronger back, or weight lifting.
  • His coaching style is to the point and yet laid back.

Theme 2

❤️ About Support

  • He will work with you, and it not pushy.
  • Very supportive.
  • He embodies the very essence of a wonderful coach.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is medium because the two reviews are detailed and consistent but the sample size is very small.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

PE158F1 review
PE2191 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

2

A+ 2

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values