AI Rate Professor

English

Peter Tate

ENGLISH101 · ENG60 · ENGL100 · ENGLISH100 · ENG100 · 12 lifetime ratings

AI rating
17/100
RMP rating
2.3/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
4.3

The decision

unless you specifically want a demanding writing course and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerHarsh essay gradingHeavy paper workloadBoring lecturesLow supportWriting-intensive
  • Most students describe Tate as .
  • Many reviews say he is boring, unhelpful, or .
  • A small minority say knowledgeable or skilled writers can learn from him, but the overall recommendation signal is very poor.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

15/100

Getting an A appears extremely difficult because students describe , and very high standards.

All evidence comes from in-person English reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

22/100

The course is intellectually and practically demanding because , and college-level writing standards.

All course .

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

45/100

, but one review says he rarely misses class and long lectures make attendance part of the experience.

Only in-person reviews mention class meetings, and they do not prove a .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

12/100

Students overwhelmingly advise against taking him because of , and little perceived support.

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

8/100

Students repeatedly call him picky, strict, and harsh on essays, with one review .

Format shift

.

Workload

Overwhelming

12/100

The workload , and up to 36-42 pages of writing in one semester.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Poor

30/100

Although a few students say he knows the subject, most describe him as boring, unsupportive, and ineffective at teaching writing.

Format shift

Teaching .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

18/100

Assessment appears heavily assignment-based because reviews emphasize essays, annotations, papers, and a research paper more than exams.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

12 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews are mostly negative, , and weak student support.

Main concern

Students repeatedly and a .

What students said

“A ton of papers.”
ENG100
“He's a .”
ENGLISH101
“great teacher...lots of essays but the class is college writing... ”
ENG100

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove any exam policy, proctoring, open-book status, midterm format, or .

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and papers, and do not clearly prove exam format or .

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“A ton of papers. Expect up to 36-42 Pages of work per semester.”

Voice snapshots generated from 12 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and recommendation. Credibility rating: High.

⚖️

8/100

“Very picky on mistakes and .”

📚 Workload Load

12/100

“A ton of essays and a but easy.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

12/100

“ !!!!”

Theme 1

📝 About Papers and Workload

  • A ton of papers.
  • . there is ! but an .
  • A ton of essays and a but easy.

Theme 2

⚖️

  • Very picky on mistakes and .
  • He's a .
  • This guy is a spelling and if you are not interested in doing absolutely perfect in his class.

Theme 3

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • I learned absolutely nothing.
  • He is not there to teach you, .
  • Pete definately knows his stuff. You can learn a lot from him if you can keep yourself from falling asleep during his 2 hour(never any less) class times.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

12

Recent reviews read by the AI

12

Lifetime ratings

78/100

Evidence confidence

Twelve reviews over multiple years provide consistent, , and teaching style, though some are old.

Inside 12 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 51
3 out of 52
2 out of 54
1 out of 53

Course coverage

ENG1006 reviews
ENGL1002 reviews
ENGLISH1002 reviews
ENG601 review
ENGLISH1011 review

Reported outcomes

F results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values