AI Rate Professor

Fashion

Mary Jo Jarnagin

FASH107 · FASH190 · FASHFASH · FASH188 · FASH206 · FASH201 · 11 lifetime ratings

AI rating
66/100
RMP rating
3.7/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
2.3

The decision

Take her if you need the fashion course and , and staying proactive.

Best fit · Effort For RewardFashion expertiseUnorganizedHelpful when askedEasy projectsAttendance matters
  • Students generally agree she knows fashion and can teach useful industry material.
  • Intro fashion courses can be easy, but advanced pattern or production classes require more skill and commitment.
  • The biggest issue is organization, with several students saying lessons, information, and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

76/100

Several lower-level fashion and tests, but advanced courses are not easy A classes.

All Easy A because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

58/100

Some courses are easy, but and production classes require speed, sewing or patternmaking background, and .

All course-easiness evidence is from in-person fashion courses.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

because students say missing class can cause failure and there may be little written structure outside class.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

56/100

Students appreciate her fashion knowledge and kindness, but organization problems make the experience uneven.

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

70/100

Some students say projects and tests are extremely easy, but advanced classes and .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

62/100

Workload is light in some FASH107 reviews but heavier in advanced courses that , and projects.

Format shift

In-person workload varies by course level, with lower-level courses much lighter than advanced production or pattern classes.

Teaching experience

Average

62/100

She is knowledgeable, nice, and helpful, but repeated comments about disorganization and incorrect information lower the teaching score.

Format shift

In-person reviews consistently mix fashion expertise with organization concerns.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

34/100

Reviews emphasize projects, homework, hands-on fashion work, and a .

Format shift

Only in-person reviews mention assessments.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

11 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews describe a knowledgeable fashion instructor whose classes range from very easy projects to demanding advanced skill courses.

Main concern

Her organization and clarity are inconsistent, so students may need to ask questions and track expectations carefully.

What students said

“ and her tests require no studying whatsoever.”
FASH107
“Knows fashion but .”
FASHFASH
“if you don't show up a lot in this class you will fall behind and fail.”
FASH190

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

, but reviews mention three tests and that she reads exam material in class, with .

Three TestsProjectsExam Material Read In Class

Assessment risk

Standard

65/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and projects, but do not clearly prove open-book, closed-book, or proctoring rules.

Three TestsProjectsExam Material Read In Class
“She will read you everything that is on the exam.”
FASH107
“there are and four projects.”
FASH107

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Knows fashion but .”

Voice snapshots generated from 11 reviews, highlighting key themes in expertise, organization, workload, and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

62/100

“ but she teaches a lot of different classes so give her a break.”

📈 Grade Effort

76/100

“all extremely easy. i don't know how anyone can have below an A in her class.”

⚠️ Organization Risk

42/100

“ and consistently gives incorrect information to her students.”

Theme 1

👗 About Fashion Expertise

  • Ms. Jarnagin teaches us a lot of material and is very good in Textiles.
  • .
  • This class was honestly the best and the worst!

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • and her tests require no studying whatsoever.
  • Don't expect to get an easy A in this class.
  • a design major.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Organization

  • .
  • All notes no handouts.
  • there was never anything to be done.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

11

Recent reviews read by the AI

11

Lifetime ratings

72/100

Evidence confidence

The 11 in-person reviews give consistent themes, but the sample is modest and spans different fashion courses with different difficulty levels.

Inside 11 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 57
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

FASH1074 reviews
FASH2063 reviews
FASH1881 review
FASH1901 review
FASH2011 review
Show 1 more courses
FASHFASH1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

1

A+ 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values