AI Rate Professor

Child Development

Sharon Deleon

CDES205 · CDES120 · 12 lifetime ratings

AI rating
43/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

if and learn independently.

Best fit · Self Taught ProSweet but inconsistentConfusing testsDelayed feedbackResearch paper heavy
  • Students describe her as kind, but teaching clarity varies sharply.
  • Tests and study guides are a repeated problem across formats.
  • and awkward paper logistics.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

An A is possible in some online sections, but many students report , and paper-heavy work.

Online has one easy-A report, while and unclear expectations.

Is the course easy?

Standard

43/100

The course content is not always described as hard, but , and research-paper demands make it feel harder.

, while in-person reviews split between enjoyable lectures and .

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

55/100

Attendance is not clearly graded as mandatory, but and tests.

In-person evidence says attendance helps preparation, while .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

50/100

Recommendations are mixed because students like her personality but often criticize organization, testing, and feedback.

Online and and strong warnings in each format.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

32/100

Grades look mixed, and , and unclear grading expectations.

Format shift

Online has one lenient paper-focused review, while in-person reviews and no .

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Students mention tedious Connect work, multiple research papers, interviews, tests, and .

Format shift

Online workload complaints focus on Connect homework and paper logistics, while and projects.

Teaching experience

Average

45/100

Her kindness is consistent, but teaching clarity and organization receive sharply mixed reviews.

Format shift

Online students criticize disorganized materials, while and confusing instruction.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Assessment appears , and tests rather than relying only on exams.

Format shift

Online evidence emphasizes papers, interviews, Connect homework, and tests; , and projects.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

7 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews praise her kindness and some engaging classes, but , and .

Main concern

Students disagree strongly on .

What students said

“The class over all was very interesting and enjoyable.”
CDES120
“ and long.”
CDES120
“ .”
CDES205

Remote format

Online

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are polarized, with one easy-A report but several complaints , and paper hassles.

Main concern

Online structure and .

What students said

“This class was not difficult.”
CDES120
“Her study guides hardly cover what would be on the test.”
22829
“ , as is her teaching style.”
CDES120

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention tests and weak study guides, but they do not clearly prove open-book, webcam, Lockdown Browser, or closed-book policies.

TestsStudy Guides Do Not Match TestsHard Tests

Assessment risk

Standard

42/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and based on class notes, but they do not clearly prove closed-book rules or proctoring details.

Hard TestsClass Notes MatterStudy Guides Do Not Help
“ and long.”
CDES120
“ .”
CDES120
“The study guides don't help at all.”
CDES120

Online

, and study guides that miss test content, but they do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, open-book, or closed-book rules.

Online TestsLate Test PostingStudy Guides Do Not Match Tests
“Her study guides hardly cover what would be on the test.”
22829
“She only posted the ; the other times she would post them one or two days late.”
CDES120
“The .”
CDES120

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She seems like a sweet grandma who know what she's doing, and she is a sweet grandma but she sucks as a teacher sorry to say.”

Voice snapshots generated from 12 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences; credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

45/100

“ , as is her teaching style.”

📚 Workload Cost

28/100

“She is essentially asking for 3 research papers in one semester”

👍 Recommendation Level

50/100

“ and useful.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She was the nicest lady and a great teacher!
  • Nothing really made sense to the class.
  • Her lecture audio is a complete waste of time too; .

Theme 2

📝 About Tests and Papers

  • and long.
  • The but it takes so long to receive them that it's almost pointless.
  • The but they help you learn the material.

Theme 3

⚖️ About Student Experience

  • The class over all was very interesting and enjoyable.
  • I've never felt the need to rate a professor to warn students, until now.
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

12

Recent reviews read by the AI

12

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Twelve reviews across several years give enough detail to show a consistent pattern of kindness but inconsistent course organization.

Inside 12 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 52
3 out of 52
2 out of 52
1 out of 53

Course coverage

CDES1209 reviews
1201 review
228291 review
CDES2051 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

8 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

3

B+ 1 · B 2

C range

3

C+ 2 · C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values