AI Rate Professor

English As A Second Language

Rebekah Celaya

ESL35 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
9/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
2.0

The decision

, but the only available student comment is strongly negative.

Best fit · Self Taught ProVery negative reviewExtra credit mentionedLow detail
  • The only review is extremely negative but provides almost no detail.
  • is tagged, but the .
  • Confidence is low because there .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

is tagged and difficulty is low, but the .

The limited .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

65/100

The reported difficulty is low, but the comment is too vague to judge the course content confidently.

, so no format difference can be assessed.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

The .

The .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

10/100

The only student review says the experience was horrible and .

All recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

62/100

is tagged, but there is no direct explanation of .

Format shift

Only one in-person review exists.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

Difficulty is reported as low, but the comment does not describe workload.

Format shift

The .

Teaching experience

Awful

10/100

The only teaching comment is a one-word negative review.

Format shift

All teaching .

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

The review does .

Format shift

There is no online evidence and the in-person review is vague.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The single in-person review is negative and .

Main concern

The main concern is a very poor review with almost no supporting detail.

What students said

“horrible”
ESL35

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The reviews do not clearly describe exams, proctoring, open-book rules, or .

Reviews do not clearly prove exam format

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The policy or .

Reviews do not clearly prove exam format

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“horrible”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 review, highlighting the . Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

10/100

“horrible”

👍 Recommendation Rate

10/100

“horrible”

⚖️

62/100

“horrible”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • horrible

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • horrible

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

18/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is low because there is only one very short review with almost no detail.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ESL351 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values