AI Rate Professor

Communication

Margaret Donahoe

JOUR110 · CRTV129 · 122F · 8 lifetime ratings

AI rating
30/100
RMP rating
1.9/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
2.1

The decision

if you prioritize an easy grade over teaching quality and classroom experience.

Best fit · Easy A HunterEasy ABoring LecturesUnclear InstructionsRude ToneTake-Home Quizzes
  • Most students describe the class as easy but not worthwhile.
  • Common complaints include boring , and unhelpful communication.
  • A small minority praise her radio experience and hands-on help, but the overall tone is strongly negative.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

84/100

Students repeatedly call the class easy, especially because of and manageable exams, though the experience is unpleasant.

All Easy A .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

76/100

The coursework is not intellectually hard, but difficult.

All course .

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

55/100

Reviews do not clearly prove a , but lectures are the main class activity.

online evidence available.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

18/100

Most students warn against taking her because they , and not helpful.

All and is mostly negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

78/100

Grades appear lenient because students report easy quizzes and easy A outcomes despite disliking the class.

Format shift

.

Workload

Light

78/100

The workload includes quizzes, exams, and a research paper, but students still describe the class as easy.

Format shift

In-person reviews mention 12 take-home quizzes, exams, and one paper.

Teaching experience

Poor

24/100

Most students describe lectures as .

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

, and a research paper.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

8 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

In-person reviews mostly describe an easy class with , and a frustrating professor.

Main concern

Students may get an easy grade but feel they learned little and received weak support.

What students said

“It is an easy class but I can't stand her.”
JOUR110
“12 .”
JOUR110
“I learned nothing.”
CRTV129

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The , but reviews do not clearly prove open-book exams, proctoring rules, or .

Take-Home QuizzesMidtermFinalResearch Paper

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

80/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

final, and a research paper, but do not clearly prove exam proctoring or open-book policies.

Take-Home QuizzesMidtermFinalResearch Paper
“12 .”
JOUR110
“The ”
JOUR110
“12 take home quizzes. 2 exams and .”
JOUR110

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“It is an easy A but believe me,it isnt worth the headache she will give you.”

Voice snapshots generated from 8 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and student satisfaction. Credibility rating: Medium.

⚠️ Recommendation Risk

18/100

“ .”

📈 Easy Grade

84/100

“Take this class if you want an easy A and aren't easily annoyed by an unhelpful/ not knowledgeable teacher”

👨‍🏫 Teaching Quality

24/100

“She does nothing but .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She does nothing but .
  • Lectures are boring & half the time have nothing to do with the subject.
  • A wonderful teacher that really enjoys the subject that she is teaching.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty And Grades

  • The
  • It is an easy class but I can't stand her.
  • Extremely easy class.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Student Experience

  • I learned nothing.
  • Unprofessional. !!
  • waste of time & money.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

8

Recent reviews read by the AI

8

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

The evidence is moderately credible because 8 in-person reviews are detailed and consistent, but the sample is small and mostly from one term.

Inside 8 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 52
1 out of 54

Course coverage

JOUR1106 reviews
122F1 review
CRTV1291 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

3

A 2 · A- 1

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values