AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Claudia Guttierez

MATH60 · MATH129 · MATH40 · MATH20 · 9 lifetime ratings

AI rating
62/100
RMP rating
2.9/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
3.4

The decision

Take her if you can study independently, use , and .

Best fit · Effort For RewardHelpful But InconsistentExtra CreditExact GradingSelf-Study RiskManageable Tests
  • Positive reviews say she cares, offers , and makes tests manageable.
  • and students may need to teach themselves.
  • Getting a good grade is possible, but students must follow her methods closely and study consistently.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

68/100

and , but students still need steady study and must match her expected work style.

All .

Is the course easy?

Standard

54/100

The math content is manageable for prepared students but becomes .

All course .

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

50/100

Reviews do not prove strict attendance, but students are told , and pay attention.

In-person reviews emphasize class participation and notes, with .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

58/100

Some students highly recommend her for support and , while others warn that .

Recommendation and is mixed.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

62/100

raises grade potential, but strict to some students.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

56/100

The workload is typical for math, with , and group projects requiring steady effort.

Format shift

, and group classroom projects.

Teaching experience

Average

55/100

She is described as caring and helpful by some students, but .

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

Tests and a comprehensive final are central, with , and group projects also relevant.

Format shift

, and a comprehensive final.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

9 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews show a mixed math and grade-friendly but .

Main concern

Students may lose points for not solving problems her exact way even when answers are correct.

What students said

“She gives lots of Do it.”
MATH40
“Need to work hard for the grade.”
MATH129
“ if you have correct answer.”
MATH129

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams appear standard math tests based on lecture, textbook, and or proctoring policies.

TestsPre-Test QuestionsComprehensive FinalLecture And Homework Material

Assessment risk

Standard

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and a comprehensive final, but do not clearly prove open-book, closed-book, or proctoring rules.

TestsPre-Test QuestionsComprehensive Final
“ you could expect to see on a test”
MATH129
“ .”
MATH129
“ .”
MATH40

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Need to work hard for the grade. Make sure to study until you understand the material.”

Voice snapshots generated from 9 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and . Credibility rating: Medium.

📈 Grade Effort

68/100

“She gives lots of Do it. It really helps your grade.”

👨‍🏫 Teaching Quality

55/100

“She cares for her students and really helps out if you're struggling.”

⚖️

62/100

“ if you have correct answer.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and cares for her students.
  • She's not good at explaining formulas and hard to learn from.
  • You basically are teaching yourself the whole course!

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty And Grades

  • She also offers a lot of opportunities!
  • Need to work hard for the grade.
  • Pretty self explanatory, be in , and you'll pass.

Theme 3

🧪 About Tests And Grading

  • .
  • .
  • She wants it EXACTLY her way or it's wrong even if the answer is correct.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

9

Recent reviews read by the AI

9

Lifetime ratings

66/100

Evidence confidence

The evidence is moderately credible because 9 in-person reviews provide specific but mixed experiences across several math courses.

Inside 9 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 52
3 out of 54
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

MATH1293 reviews
MATH203 reviews
109651 review
MATH401 review
MATH601 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

7 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

1

B 1

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 2