AI Rate Professor

Accounting

Edward Mannes

ACCT90 · ACCT112F · ACCT112 · 7 lifetime ratings

AI rating
13/100
RMP rating
1.4/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

Avoid unless you can teach yourself advanced accounting material with little guidance.

Best fit · Self Taught ProDisorganized pacingUnclear lecturesSelf-teaching requiredTests on untaught materialUnhelpful support
  • Most students describe the class as , and hard to survive.
  • , and course pacing fell behind or changed suddenly.
  • One positive review says participation and effort can work, but still calls the class difficult.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

An A appears possible only with heavy preparation, persistence, and tolerance for .

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

24/100

Students describe fast advanced lectures, hard tax material, and .

All course .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do not clearly prove a , though participation was expected in at least one class.

, and no online evidence exists.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

12/100

Most students strongly warn against taking him because of , and poor support.

All , and the tone is overwhelmingly negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

26/100

Grades look achievable for some students, but reviews describe failed credit, low grades, and tests on untaught material.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

22/100

Students describe a 2-unit class feeling like 4 units, heavy chapters, assignments, exams, and last-minute work.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Awful

18/100

Teaching is repeatedly described as , and dependent on student self-teaching.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

Balanced

60/100

Reviews mention chapters, homework, assignments, group projects, and .

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

7 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

teaching, poor organization, and difficult exams.

Main concern

while dealing with and late course changes.

What students said

“ ”
ACCT112F
“Instructor rapidly teaches non-stop at advanced level - no clarity.”
ACCT90
“ .”
ACCT112

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

because students repeatedly say tests covered untaught material and were poorly supported.

Tests on Untaught MaterialExams Posted LateUnclear Test Preparation

Assessment risk

Strict

25/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and tests, but do not clearly prove open-book, closed-book, webcam, or proctoring rules.

Tests on Untaught MaterialExams Posted Late
“ ”
ACCT112F
“He fell behind and .”
ACCT90

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ , & exams -did no post when due, syllabus slacker, unapproachable, not helpful; students teach themselves, tests - untaught material, bad attitude.”

Voice snapshots generated from 7 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, workload, and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

18/100

“Instructor rapidly teaches non-stop at advanced level - no clarity.”

⚠️ Recommendation Risk

12/100

“ .”

📚 Workload Pressure

22/100

“Worth 2 units but equal to 4.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • , syllabus slacker, rushes to catch up-lousy sloppy teaching, unapproachable, not helpful; students teach themselves, tests on untaught material.
  • . as to what he wants.
  • . I read it and still needed help!

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Very tough class.
  • It was not an easy class and you had to work for it.
  • I couldn't contribute enough to get credit in that time frame and failed.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

7

Recent reviews read by the AI

7

Lifetime ratings

68/100

Evidence confidence

Seven detailed reviews across several courses show a consistent negative pattern, though they are older.

Inside 7 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 52
1 out of 54

Course coverage

ACCT1122 reviews
ACCT112F2 reviews
ACCT902 reviews
1121 review

Reported outcomes

C range results lead the reported letter grades.

7 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

3

C+ 1 · C 1 · C- 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 1