AI Rate Professor

Chemistry

Jose Ruiz

111A · CHEM111A · CHEM107 · 10 lifetime ratings

AI rating
0/100
RMP rating
1.3/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
4.7

The decision

Avoid unless you are highly self-directed and can learn chemistry independently before class.

Best fit · Self Taught ProDisorganized lecturesVery difficult testsFast pacePoor explanationsNot recommended
  • Students repeatedly describe lectures as , and confusing.
  • Tests and quizzes are viewed as much harder than the material taught.
  • Even students who call him .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

8/100

Getting an A looks extremely hard because tests are described as difficult, misaligned, and based on material not clearly taught.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

12/100

Chemistry is made much harder by fast lectures, skipped details, and .

.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do not clearly .

, and they do not clearly address attendance policy.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

3/100

Students overwhelmingly advise against taking him because and exams feel unfair.

All .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

12/100

because quizzes and tests are repeatedly described as extremely difficult and poorly aligned with instruction.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

25/100

Students say they must read ahead and work hard because .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Awful

8/100

Students repeatedly describe him as , and unable to teach tested material effectively.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

88/100

Reviews focus heavily on quizzes and tests as the .

Format shift

Only in-person reviews mention assessments.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

10 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are strongly negative, citing disorganization, skipped material, and .

Main concern

The main concern is being tested on material students feel was not taught clearly.

What students said

“I would honestly say run while you can!”
CHEM111A
“ and just expects you to know them even though he doesn't teach it.”
111A
“The quizzes and .”
CHEM107

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams and quizzes are high-risk because students say they are difficult, long, and not aligned with what was taught.

Difficult TestsDifficult QuizzesMisaligned Test ContentLong Tests

Assessment risk

Strict

15/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and tests, but do not clearly prove open-book status, closed-book status, or proctoring rules.

Difficult TestsDifficult QuizzesMisaligned Test ContentLong Tests
“The .”
CHEM107
“The quizzes and .”
CHEM107
“ and just expects you to know them even though he doesn't teach it.”
111A

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I would honestly say run while you can!”

Voice snapshots generated from 10 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

8/100

“The whole class was also practically lost throughout the lecture.”

🧪

15/100

“The quizzes and .”

👍 Recommendation Risk

3/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • His lectures are very boring and he goes too fast in his lectures.
  • The lectures consisted of
  • and teaches you one thing and

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Be prepared to work.
  • The quizzes and .
  • and just expects you to know them even though he doesn't teach it.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Recommendation

  • I would honestly say run while you can!
  • .
  • stay away from this professor.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

10

Recent reviews read by the AI

10

Lifetime ratings

84/100

Evidence confidence

There are 10 detailed in-person reviews over multiple terms with strong consistency in negative teaching and .

Inside 10 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 58

Course coverage

CHEM111A6 reviews
CHEM1073 reviews
111A1 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

6 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

2

C 2

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not_Sure_Yet 2