AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Claudia Gutierrez

MATH129 · MATH150A · MATH100 · 6 lifetime ratings

AI rating
19/100
RMP rating
2.2/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.8

The decision

Avoid Claudia Gutierrez unless you are prepared for , and little margin for error.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerStrict graderTests do not match lecturesRushed lecturesLow recommendationAttendance-sensitive
  • Most students say , and .
  • as strict or .
  • One positive review says she can make material understandable, but the overall tone is strongly negative.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

26/100

Getting an A appears difficult because , and can punish small mistakes heavily.

because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

30/100

The math content is made , and tests that feel harder than the material taught.

Only in-person reviews exist, and they consistently describe the course as harder than expected.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

20/100

because there are , and students must follow her exact methods.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

24/100

Most students do not recommend her because of , and exams that do not match instruction.

All .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

18/100

Multiple reviews call her grading rough or strict, with heavy penalties for small errors and required methods.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

45/100

Workload is not described as overwhelming, but , and test pressure create steady demands.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Poor

32/100

Most students say she rushes, confuses students, and fails to align lectures with tests, despite one positive review.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

82/100

Student complaints focus heavily on tests and .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews are mostly negative, focusing , and poor alignment between instruction and exams.

Main concern

Students report that and graded very strictly.

What students said

“The notes she writes do not match with the .”
MATH129
“ .”
MATH150A
“Lectures dont relate to the exams!!”
MATH129

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams and quizzes are described as strict, harder than class examples, and tightly graded, though one review says a cheat sheet is allowed.

Harder Tests Than LecturesStrict Test GradingCheat Sheet AllowedWeekly QuizzesNo Makeups

Assessment risk

Strict

22/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

cheat sheet that was not useful, weekly quizzes, and no makeups, but no proctoring or open-book policy is proven.

Harder Tests Than LecturesStrict Test GradingCheat Sheet AllowedWeekly QuizzesNo Makeups
“Allows a cheat sheet, but it's not useful because what she tells you to study is not what she will put on the test.”
MATH129
“On the tests and quizes, she expects the students to show the work exactly as she would do it.”
MATH129
“ and does not do make ups.”
MATH100

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“The notes she writes do not match with the .”

Voice snapshots generated from 6 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and attendance. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

32/100

“Rushes through lecture, randomly calls on students for the next step before you can write down the last 2 steps shes done.”

⚖️

18/100

“I missed one question that wasn't even a math problem and and dropped my overall grade by 25%.”

⚠️ Recommendation Risk

24/100

“ !”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • lectures are somewhat clear, but when it comes to the studied.
  • Rushes through lecture, randomly calls on students for the next step before you can write down the last 2 steps shes done.
  • She makes the material easy to understand.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Grades roughly.
  • .
  • .

Theme 3

🧪 About Exams

  • What she teaches is not what she gives out for .
  • Lectures dont relate to the exams!!
  • YOU WILL FAIL.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

6

Recent reviews read by the AI

6

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

The sample is small with 6 reviews, but the negative themes are detailed and highly consistent across recent math courses.

Inside 6 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 52
2 out of 50
1 out of 53

Course coverage

MATH1293 reviews
MATH1002 reviews
MATH150A1 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 2