AI Rate Professor

Graphic Arts

Kelly Capps

GRAPHICDESIGN · ART140 · ART123 · ART135 · 7 lifetime ratings

AI rating
63/100
RMP rating
3.6/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.7

The decision

if you want practical career guidance in art or design and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerCareer-focusedHelpful mentorHeavy workloadBlunt feedbackInconsistent feedback
  • Students praise his real-world art and design career advice.
  • Work can be demanding but often helps students improve practical skills.
  • Some students report , boring repetition, or harsh personal criticism.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

56/100

A good grade is possible, but students , and .

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

The content is practical rather than highly technical, but students say the workload and expectations can be demanding.

All course and design reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do .

Only in-person reviews exist, and they .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

58/100

Students recommend him for career-minded artists but , and blunt criticism.

All recommendation evidence comes from in-person reviews, with strongly mixed experiences.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

50/100

Grades can be good, but students question the clarity and consistency of .

Format shift

, and the evidence is mixed.

Workload

Heavy

34/100

Several students describe a lot of work, though some say it is useful for skill growth.

Format shift

Workload .

Teaching experience

Average

60/100

He offers strong career perspective and practical mentoring, but and classroom delivery are inconsistent.

Format shift

learned.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

Reviews mainly discuss assignments, presentations, portfolio work, and .

Format shift

Only in-person reviews describe assessment, with no online evidence.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

7 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews describe a career-focused instructor but .

Main concern

Feedback and .

What students said

“If it wasn't for him I would've never set realistic goals for myself.”
ART123
“ ”
ART123
“He makes us work alot, but skill.”
ART140

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove an .

Exam policy not clearly proven

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, open-book rules, or finals.

Exam policy not clearly proven

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“He puts the advertising/design career in perspective for you.”

Voice snapshots generated from 7 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, workload, and feedback. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Career Mentoring

60/100

“He puts the advertising/design career in perspective for you.”

📚 Workload Reality

34/100

“He makes us work alot, but skill.”

⚠️

50/100

“ ”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He also helped out students who were other-creative majors
  • He is the one of .
  • Boring.He repeats this same things over and over thru whole semester.

Theme 2

📈 About Work & Grades

  • He makes us work alot, but skill.
  • .
  • Never really sure if I did the me in the end.

Theme 3

💬 About Personality

  • He was an ok guy though I just feel like little was learned and I spent a bunch of money.
  • if you have a fragile ego.
  • Working professional that tells the truth and helps you improve and build your skills as an individual.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

7

Recent reviews read by the AI

7

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Seven detailed but disagreement.

Inside 7 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ART1233 reviews
ART1402 reviews
ART1351 review
GRAPHICDESIGN1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values