AI Rate Professor

English

Stephen Sharp

ENGL101 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
11/100
RMP rating
2.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

Avoid unless and handle harsh feedback independently.

Best fit · Self Taught ProMandatory AttendanceUnclear ExpectationsHard to Track GradesCritical Feedback
  • Students describe unclear expectations and .
  • because in-class journals affect the portfolio grade.
  • as critical and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

18/100

Getting an A appears difficult because and .

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

The writing content and assignment tracking rather than by clearly described advanced material.

Only in-person reviews describe the course challenge.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

5/100

because in-class journals are collected for the portfolio grade.

The .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

12/100

Students do not recommend the class because , and .

, and both are negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

15/100

Students say he is difficult to please and .

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

25/100

Students must , and portfolio materials with little guidance.

Format shift

Workload .

Teaching experience

Awful

20/100

and .

Format shift

Teaching .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

20/100

Assessment appears centered on journals, drafts, essays, and a portfolio rather than exams.

Format shift

Assessment .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are consistently , and discouraging feedback.

Main concern

Students may struggle because expectations, grades, and .

What students said

“ .”
ENGL101
“ .”
ENGL101

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do .

Reviews do not clearly prove exam format

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews mention portfolio work but do .

Portfolio-Based WorkReviews do not clearly prove exam format
“Keep track of all your rough drafts and as he doesn't have a list for you to refer to when submitting your portfolio.”
ENGL101

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ .”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and attendance. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Clarity

20/100

“ .”

⚖️

15/100

“ .”

📌

5/100

“ as you do Journal Entries in class and he collects them all when you submit your portfolio (major part of grade).”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • .
  • Discouraging of students ability.

Theme 2

📋 About Workload & Grades

  • .
  • Difficult to keep track of assignments.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

35/100

Evidence confidence

Only two old reviews are available, but and .

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ENGL1012 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values