AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Rachel Coleman

MATH150A · MATH010 · MATH142 · MATAH015 · MATH20 · MATH150 · MATH100 · 12 lifetime ratings

AI rating
58/100
RMP rating
3.7/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.5

The decision

She is a reasonable choice for lower-level math, but calculus students should be cautious because the negative reviews are intense and specific.

Best fit · Effort For RewardCourse-dependentHelpful in lower mathCalculus complaintsLots of homeworkHard exams
  • Reviews are sharply split by course level, with lower math students praising her clarity and care while calculus students strongly warn against taking her.
  • Getting a good grade appears manageable in lower-level courses but much harder in , and difficult exams.
  • Students often describe her as patient and helpful, but negative reviews and exams may not match preparation.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

54/100

An A seems attainable in lower math with homework and studying, but and heavy work that make grades costly.

because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

and manageable, while Calculus is described as , and exam-heavy.

because there are no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

50/100

Students repeatedly advise showing up and , but .

because there are no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

57/100

Recommendation depends heavily on the course, with strong support for lower math and strong warnings for Calculus.

because there are no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

52/100

Some reviews say tests are not harsh or quizzes are easy, but and .

Format shift

because there are no online reviews.

Workload

Heavy

33/100

Multiple reviews mention lots of homework, weekly quizzes, and .

Format shift

because there are no online reviews.

Teaching experience

Average

62/100

She is praised as , and caring in lower math, but and self-teaching.

Format shift

because there are no online reviews.

Assessment method

Balanced

64/100

Reviews mention homework, quizzes, tests, exam reviews, and exams, so assessment appears mixed but .

Format shift

because there are no online reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

12 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

lower math and severe criticism in Calculus.

Main concern

Calculus reviews report fast , and self-teaching.

What students said

“She will make sure you understand the lecture, just ask questions.”
MATH20
“gives a ton of hard”
MATH150
“this class is pretty much a self taught class.”
MATH150A

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

difficult calculus exams but no clearly proven open-book or proctoring rules.

Hard ExamsWeekly QuizzesExam ReviewsNo Clear Proctoring Policy

Assessment risk

Standard

43/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and , but they do not clearly prove open-book, closed-book, webcam, or proctoring rules.

Hard ExamsWeekly QuizzesExam Reviews
“ ”
MATH150
“ .”
MATH150A
“you do need to prepare well for the exams because they are a little more challenging.”
MATAH015

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ and does explain clearly. If you are stuck on a problem, she will take the time to go over it in class.”

Voice snapshots generated from 12 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and workload; credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

62/100

“She is very passionate and genuinely wants her students to do well.”

⚖️ Course Dependence

57/100

“ of homework, quiz every week, the exams are extremely hard”

📚 Workload And Exams

33/100

“Fast pace, lots of learned”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • she is proficient and .
  • She will make sure you understand the lecture, just ask questions.
  • She never explained the material properly and basically just copied the book on the board.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty And Grades

  • , and she hands out fill-in-the-blank notes.
  • Super easy I took her about 3 semesters ago.
  • the the lecture

Theme 3

⚠️ About Calculus Concerns

  • .
  • this class is pretty much a self taught class.
  • .. .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

12

Recent reviews read by the AI

12

Lifetime ratings

70/100

Evidence confidence

The 12 reviews provide useful detail, but they span older years and opinions differ sharply by course level.

Inside 12 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 57
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 53
1 out of 51

Course coverage

MATH204 reviews
MATH150A3 reviews
MATAH0151 review
MATH0101 review
MATH1001 review
Show 2 more courses
MATH1421 review
MATH1501 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B 1

C range

1

C 1

D range

1

D 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Rather_Not_Say 1