AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Rachel Lui

150A · PRECALC125 · MATH150B · MATH142 · MATH20 · MATH120 · 17 lifetime ratings

AI rating
72/100
RMP rating
3.7/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.7

The decision

if and are willing to study hard for a fair but not effortless grade.

Best fit · Effort For RewardClear lecturesStrict gradingHard examsOptional homeworkExtra credit available
  • Students often praise Lui for and .
  • The course can be hard, time-consuming, and .
  • There is meaningful grade , and in some sections.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

56/100

A is possible with , and curves, but students repeatedly say it requires serious study.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Standard

43/100

The math content is manageable when taught clearly, but exams and pace make it challenging for many students.

Only in-person reviews exist, and .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

but do not clearly prove an .

, and there are no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

70/100

if the student accepts strict grading and hard work.

All recommendation evidence is from in-person reviews, with a positive but mixed tone.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

Grading can feel strict, but curves, , allowed notes, and .

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

32/100

Students describe lots of studying, time-consuming homework, and .

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Good

76/100

Most positive reviews emphasize clear, organized lectures and and strictness.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews exist, and they show generally good but uneven teaching experience.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

Comments , and exam preparation, with homework mainly used for practice.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

17 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

, strict grading, and some helpful grade supports.

Main concern

Students who fall behind or .

What students said

“She is tough, however .”
MATH20
“ and LOTS of studying required to even pass.”
MATH142
“I got an A, but I worked my butt off.”
MATH120

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams can be hard, but some , and , making the policy mixed but not harshly proctored.

Allowed NotesOpen-Book QuizzesExtra CreditHard ExamsCurve Based on Highest Score

Assessment risk

Standard

62/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews explicitly mention hard exams plus student-friendly supports such as , and .

Allowed NotesOpen-Book QuizzesExtra CreditHard ExamsCurve Based on Highest Score
“One page of notes .”
MATH120
“The ...”
MATH120
“ .”
MATH120

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She is tough, however . By seeing my next Math professor I already miss her way of teaching.”

Voice snapshots generated from 17 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and exams. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

76/100

“ , and the way .”

📈 Effort For Grades

56/100

“I got an A, but I worked my butt off.”

⚖️

55/100

“ and LOTS of studying required to even pass.”

📝

62/100

“The ...”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She breaks down everything and does not leave room for doubts.
  • She made the and made it easy to ask questions.
  • , and the way .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Just study lots and everywhere if you want A.
  • I got an A, but I worked my butt off.
  • and LOTS of studying required to even pass.

Theme 3

🧪

  • the she covers in class.
  • One page of notes .
  • Three opportunities were given.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

17

Recent reviews read by the AI

17

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Seventeen reviews across several math courses give detailed and reasonably consistent evidence despite some disagreement.

Inside 17 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 56
4 out of 55
3 out of 53
2 out of 53
1 out of 50

Course coverage

MATH1209 reviews
MATH202 reviews
1251 review
150A1 review
304591 review
Show 3 more courses
MATH1421 review
MATH150B1 review
PRECALC1251 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

10 reported outcomes

A range

7

A+ 1 · A 6

B range

2

B+ 1 · B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1