AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Talat Ahmed

MATH15 · MATH10 · 6 lifetime ratings

AI rating
34/100
RMP rating
2.7/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.2

The decision

Avoid unless you are comfortable self-studying math and and inconsistent teaching quality.

Best fit · Self Taught ProPolarizing teacherDisorganized lecturesHard to understandFrequent quizzesHelpful if you self-study
  • Reviews are sharply split, but the strongest recent comments describe poor teaching, disorganization, and difficult tests.
  • Positive reviews and that doing all the work can lead to a good grade.
  • Quizzes are frequent and may double as but demanding.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

46/100

A good grade is possible if students do all the work, but frequent quizzes, difficult tests, and .

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

34/100

The math content becomes harder because several students say .

Only in-person evidence exists, and it and very difficult.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

20/100

One review says quizzes happen almost every class and double as .

The .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

32/100

The strongest comments warn against taking her because of , and difficult tests.

and highly polarized, but recent negative reviews are intense.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

50/100

because one review mentions grade bumps and an easy B+/A-, while .

Format shift

evidence.

Workload

Heavy

30/100

Workload feels heavy because quizzes are nearly every class and if some students say the amount is manageable.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews mention workload.

Teaching experience

Poor

38/100

Several students describe her as , and poor at explaining, despite a few helpfulness comments.

Format shift

All teaching and is sharply polarized.

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

Assessment , and tests, with quizzes sometimes serving as attendance.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

about teaching and organization balanced by a few comments about helpfulness and manageable grading.

Main concern

Students may need to learn independently because several reviews say explanations are poor or .

What students said

“Does not teach AT ALL, only reviews what she assumes you already know.”
MATH15
“ ”
MATH15
“She .”
MATH10

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention frequent quizzes, tests, and study guides, with one student calling tests insanely difficult, but they .

Frequent QuizzesTestsStudy GuidesDifficult Tests

Assessment risk

Strict

35/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and tests, but do not clearly prove proctoring, open-book status, or closed-book rules.

Frequent QuizzesTestsStudy GuidesDifficult Tests
“ ”
MATH15
“ .”
MATH15
“She .”
MATH10

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Terrible!! Does not teach AT ALL, only reviews what she assumes you already know.”

Voice snapshots generated from 6 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, workload, and exams. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

38/100

“ and horrible in explaining the subject.”

📈 Grade Effort

46/100

“Just do all the work and you'll do fine in this class and learn a lot as well”

⚠️

35/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and horrible in explaining the subject.
  • .
  • Very helpful and easy.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Makes everything much more difficult than it has to be.
  • Easy B+/A-
  • but its not a lot that she gives

Theme 3

📝

  • doubles as the attendance
  • .
  • She .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

6

Recent reviews read by the AI

6

Lifetime ratings

66/100

Evidence confidence

, but opinions are polarized and the sample is small.

Inside 6 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 53

Course coverage

MATH155 reviews
MATH101 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1