AI Rate Professor

Child Development

Breda Carrizosa

CDES110 · CDES120 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
78/100
RMP rating
4.1/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.8

The decision

if you want a , but be ready for writing expectations and long lectures.

Best fit · Effort For RewardHelpful teacherProject supportLenient opportunitiesTedious lecturesSubjective paper grading
  • Most students describe her as helpful, kind, and .
  • and dropped grades, but one writing-heavy review reports harsh subjective paper grading.
  • Tests are manageable when students read the book, while lectures may feel long.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

68/100

An A seems reachable with , and dropped grades, but writing grading may not feel predictable.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

72/100

The content sounds manageable because tests are not complicated when students read, though lectures and writing can add friction.

All course difficulty evidence comes from in-person child development reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

Reviews do .

Only in-person reviews exist, and they do not give a .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

78/100

Most students recommend her for being helpful and .

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

70/100

, dropped grades, and manageable tests suggest lenient grading, but .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

62/100

Projects, reading, tests, and writing are present, but students also mention enough time and manageable expectations.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Good

80/100

Students mostly describe her as helpful, excited to teach, and nice, though one review strongly disliked the writing-heavy class.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Reviews mention projects, papers, tests, interviews, reading, and , so assessment .

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are mostly positive, , and one serious complaint about opinion-based paper grading.

Main concern

.

What students said

“Gave a lot of and helped with them when needed.”
CDES120
“ and your lowest interview grade which I liked.”
CDES120
“A !”
CDES110

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews describe tests as manageable if students read, but .

Book-Based TestsDropped Lowest Test Grade

Assessment risk

Standard

60/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews mention tests tied to reading and a or open-book rules.

Book-Based TestsDropped Lowest Test Grade
“If you read the book, the .”
CDES120
“ and your lowest interview grade which I liked.”
CDES120

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Professor Carizossa was amazing. Very into teaching her class and .”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

80/100

“Professor Carizossa was amazing. Very into teaching her class and .”

⚖️

70/100

“ and your lowest interview grade which I liked.”

⚠️ Main Risk

45/100

“A !”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Very into teaching her class and .
  • REALLY and much more.
  • She is an amazing teacher. and helpful.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • If you read the book, the .
  • She does give you ec opportunities though!
  • A !

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

60/100

Evidence confidence

, but they contain enough detail to show consistent positives and one grading concern.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

CDES1203 reviews
CDES1101 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values