AI Rate Professor

Chemistry

Daniel Cervantes-Laurean

CHEM101 · CHEM101F · 9 lifetime ratings

AI rating
12/100
RMP rating
1.5/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
4.6

The decision

unless you are comfortable teaching yourself a difficult chemistry course with .

Best fit · Self Taught ProConfusing LecturesUnprepared LabsRude ResponsesSelf-Teaching RequiredUnexpected Quizzes
  • Most students say , and hard to understand.
  • Students report , and limited help with questions.
  • The course requires heavy self-teaching and is widely described as avoidable.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

12/100

Getting an A appears very difficult because students report , and heavy self-teaching.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

20/100

Chemistry content is made harder by rushed lectures, little problem practice, and .

Only in-person reviews discuss the course challenge.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

Reviews do not clearly describe an , but they describe a rigid and authoritative classroom style.

in-person reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

12/100

Most students strongly discourage taking him because they found the , and unsupportive.

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

18/100

, and needing another professor if they need a good grade.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

22/100

The workload feels heavy because students report doing all the work themselves while keeping up with , and .

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Awful

15/100

, and ineffective at answering questions or explaining chemistry.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

60/100

Reviews mention labs, lab reports, quizzes, exams, lectures, and problem-solving expectations.

Format shift

Assessment .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

9 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

, rude behavior, poor preparation, and self-teaching.

Main concern

Students may struggle because , and .

What students said

“I was able to pass the class by teaching myself.”
CHEM101
“ . Run away!”
CHEM101
“ .”
CHEM101

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

, but reviews explicitly mention unexpected quizzes and an .

Unexpected QuizzesUnexpected ExamLab Reports

Assessment risk

Standard

42/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and exam but do not clearly prove proctoring, open-book status, or .

Unexpected QuizzesUnexpected Exam
“Unexpected quizzes and exam. Be prepared.”
CHEM101

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ . Run away!”

Voice snapshots generated from 9 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and assessment risk. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

15/100

“I feel he knows his work but just doesn't know how to teach it.”

⚠️ Recommendation Risk

12/100

“ ”

📚 Self-Teaching Load

22/100

“I was able to pass the class by teaching myself.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • . Run away!
  • students can't .
  • I feel he knows his work but just doesn't know how to teach it.

Theme 2

🧪

  • because its was never clear what we had to complete and what we had to turn in.
  • Most of the times he is unprepared for the labs.
  • we havent gotten through a single lab.

Theme 3

📝

  • don't expect to get any grades from him until way late in the semester when it's too late to do anything to improve them.
  • Unexpected quizzes and exam. Be prepared.
  • If you need a good grade in this class, find a different professor even if it means taking a semester off.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

9

Recent reviews read by the AI

9

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

consistent in describing serious teaching problems.

Inside 9 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 52
1 out of 56

Course coverage

CHEM1017 reviews
CHEM101F2 reviews

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

4

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Incomplete 1 · Not_Sure_Yet 2