AI Rate Professor

Philosophy

Dan Mages

PHIL105 · PHIL105F · PHIL105HF · 6 lifetime ratings

AI rating
58/100
RMP rating
2.9/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.3

The decision

, but if you need structured lectures and consistent exam preparation.

Best fit · Easy A HunterEasy A potentialDisorganized lecturesDiscussion basedHeavy readingMixed teaching quality
  • some enjoy the relaxed discussion style, while others find the .
  • Getting an A can be easy with attendance, , and light effort.
  • Learning value is inconsistent, with complaints about videos, limited lecture, and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

82/100

An A appears very reachable with attendance, , and modest .

.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

70/100

The class is often relaxed and video or discussion based, but and .

.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

62/100

, but strict attendance rules are not clearly proven.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

52/100

Students recommend him only if and do not need strong structure or deep learning.

All and is mixed.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

78/100

and easy A comments suggest lenient grading, though one student found tests insanely hard.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

64/100

Several students call the workload easy, but others mention a lot of reading and .

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Average

55/100

He is described as nice and engaging by some, but and enough.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

Reviews mention , and exams.

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

can be easy for grades but inconsistent for learning.

Main concern

The main risk is disorganization and exams that may not match class preparation.

What students said

“Easy A if you show up, do and put in a little effort.”
PHIL105F
“ and hes too laid back to be teaching a college level course.”
PHIL105
“A few papers and 2 tests. easy work load fun class.”
PHIL105

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention tests, including one complaint that they are very hard, but .

Two TestsHard TestsExam policy not clearly proven

Assessment risk

Varies

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and , but do not clearly prove book, proctoring, or format rules.

Two TestsHard TestsExam policy not clearly proven
“A few papers and 2 tests.”
PHIL105
“the .”
PHIL105

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Easy A if you show up, do and put in a little effort.”

Voice snapshots generated from 6 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

📈 Easy A Path

82/100

“Easy A if you show up, do and put in a little effort.”

🎯 Teaching Quality

55/100

“Mages is a cool guy but he has no experience as a professor.”

⚖️

45/100

“We just watch irrelevant movies every class and then the .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Dan mages is a great professor.
  • He lets us discuss and talk about our beliefs.
  • and hes too laid back to be teaching a college level course.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Easy A if you show up, do and put in a little effort.
  • A few papers and 2 tests. easy work load fun class.
  • A lot of reading but it didnt seem required since we never went over it.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Learning Value

  • Didn't really learn that much though... but hey an A is an A.
  • If you would like to learn something other than what you just read in the .
  • He never lectures and doesnt go over anything.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

6

Recent reviews read by the AI

6

Lifetime ratings

68/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is medium because but are older and sharply mixed.

Inside 6 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 52
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

PHIL1053 reviews
PHIL105F2 reviews
PHIL105HF1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A+ 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values