AI Rate Professor

English

Dan Willoughby

ENGL210 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
11/100
RMP rating
1.5/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

unless and you can handle poor structure.

Best fit · Self Taught ProUnpreparedDisorganizedHeavy HomeworkBusy WorkNot Recommended
  • The only review is strongly negative about organization and preparation.
  • as excessive and .
  • The student felt the and learned little.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

30/100

A B+ is possible, but the and poor structure, so the grade requires frustrating effort.

All evidence comes from one in-person review, with no online evidence.

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

The content itself is not described as intellectually hard, but poor organization and busy work make the course feel harder.

Only in-person evidence exists, so no format comparison is possible.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

The review does not clearly describe the .

, and .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

10/100

The student directly says they do not recommend the class because , and not useful.

Recommendation evidence comes only from the in-person review.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

45/100

There is and complaints about assignments.

Format shift

Only in-person evidence exists.

Workload

Overwhelming

15/100

The review says homework was excessive and .

Format shift

Only in-person evidence exists.

Teaching experience

Awful

20/100

The instructor is described as , and ineffective.

Format shift

Only in-person evidence exists.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

20/100

The review focuses on homework and .

Format shift

Only in-person evidence exists.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The in-person review describes an , and little learning value.

Main concern

Poor organization and too much busy work.

What students said

“ .”
ENGL210
“ and would then add assignments for the week via e-mail.”
ENGL210

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the .

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The , open-book status, or proctoring rules.

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ .”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 review, highlighting key themes in teaching and workload. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

20/100

“ and unprepared every class.”

📚 Workload

15/100

“ and would then add assignments for the week via e-mail.”

👍 Recommendation

10/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He seemed to be thrown into teaching the class at the last minute.
  • and unprepared every class.

Theme 2

📚 About Workload

  • and would then add assignments for the week via e-mail.
  • The and I did not learn a whole lot.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

25/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is low because there is only one older review, though it is detailed and internally consistent.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ENGL2101 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values