AI Rate Professor

Economics

Pamela Sorooshian-Tafti

ECON105 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
13/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
5.0

The decision

if you need clear teaching, helpful support, or well-aligned assessments.

Best fit · Self Taught ProUnorganizedUnhelpfulPoor CurriculumMisaligned AssessmentsAvoid
  • The only review describes the instructor as unorganized and unhelpful.
  • The curriculum is criticized as poor.
  • Assessments are said to not match the material well.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

20/100

The review gives no grade evidence and describes very high difficulty with poor support and misaligned assessments.

All evidence comes from one in-person review, with no online evidence.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

25/100

The course appears difficult because the curriculum and assessments are poorly aligned rather than because concepts are clearly taught at a high level.

Only in-person evidence exists, so no format comparison is possible.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

The review does not clearly describe the .

, and .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

10/100

The student explicitly suggests finding another teacher because of poor organization, help, curriculum, and assessments.

Recommendation evidence comes only from the in-person review.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

20/100

There is , but misaligned assessments and maximum difficulty suggest a punishing grade path.

Format shift

Only in-person evidence exists.

Workload

Moderate

45/100

The review does not clearly describe workload volume, so difficulty appears tied more .

Format shift

Only in-person evidence exists.

Teaching experience

Awful

15/100

The instructor is described as , and using a poor curriculum.

Format shift

Only in-person evidence exists.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

70/100

The only assessment evidence centers on poorly aligned assessments, with no meaningful assignment evidence.

Format shift

Only in-person evidence exists.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The in-person review reports poor organization, weak support, and assessments that do not fit the material.

Main concern

Teaching structure and assessment alignment are the main problems.

What students said

“ , and utilizes a poor curriculum.”
ECON105
“Assessments are not as relative to the material as they should be.”
ECON105

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment risk is high because reviews say assessments do not match the material, but .

Assessments Not Aligned With Material

Assessment risk

Strict

30/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The in-person review says assessments are poorly aligned but does not .

Assessments Not Aligned With Material
“Assessments are not as relative to the material as they should be.”
ECON105

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Overall, I suggest you find another teacher for the subject.”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 review, highlighting key themes in teaching and assessments. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

15/100

“ , and utilizes a poor curriculum.”

📝 Assessment Risk

30/100

“Assessments are not as relative to the material as they should be.”

👍 Recommendation

10/100

“Overall, I suggest you find another teacher for the subject.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • , and utilizes a poor curriculum.
  • Overall, I suggest you find another teacher for the subject.

Theme 2

📝 About Assessments

  • Assessments are not as relative to the material as they should be.
  • , and utilizes a poor curriculum.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

25/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is low because there is only one older review, although it is specific and strongly negative.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ECON1051 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values